Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26930412›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

DNA Damage and Repair Biomarkers in Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Exploratory Analysis.

Patrizia Vici, Simonetta Buglioni, Domenico Sergi, Laura Pizzuti, Luigi Di Lauro, Barbara Antoniani, Francesca Sperati, Irene Terrenato, Mariantonia Carosi, Teresa Gamucci and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Unboxing the molecular modalities of mutagens in cancer.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrizia ViciDivision of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Simonetta BuglioniDepartment of Pathology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Domenico SergiDivision of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Laura PizzutiDepartment of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Luigi Di LauroDivision of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Barbara AntonianiDepartment of Pathology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Francesca SperatiBiostatistics-Scientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Irene TerrenatoBiostatistics-Scientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Mariantonia CarosiDepartment of Pathology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Teresa GamucciMedical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy.
Rosanna DattiloDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Monica BartucciDrug Discovery Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Cristina VincenzoniDepartment of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Luciano MarianiDepartment of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Enrico VizzaDepartment of Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SanguinetiDepartment of Radiotherapy, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Angiolo GadducciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ilio VitaleDepartment of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Maddalena BarbaDivision of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ruggero De MariaScientific Direction, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Marcella MottoleseDepartment of Pathology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Marcello Maugeri-SaccàDivision of Medical Oncology B, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAccademia di Belle Arti di Frosinone · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer cells commonly harbour a defective G1/S checkpoint owing to the interaction of viral oncoproteins with p53 and retinoblastoma protein. The activation of the G2/M checkpoint may thus become essential for protecting cancer cells from genotoxic insults, such as chemotherapy. In 52 cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we investigated whether the levels of phosphorylated Wee1 (pWee1), a key G2/M checkpoint kinase, and γ-H2AX, a marker of DNA double-strand breaks, discriminated between patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) and those with residual disease. We also tested the association between pWee1 and phosphorylated Chk1 (pChk1), a kinase acting upstream Wee1 in the G2/M checkpoint pathway. pWee1, γ-H2AX and pChk1 were retrospectively assessed in diagnostic biopsies by immunohistochemistry. The degrees of pWee1 and pChk1 expression were defined using three different classification methods, i.e., staining intensity, Allred score, and a multiplicative score. γ-H2AX was analyzed both as continuous and categorical variable. Irrespective of the classification used, elevated levels of pWee1 and γ-H2AX were significantly associated with a lower rate of pCR. In univariate and multivariate analyses, pWee1 and γ-H2AX were both associated with reduced pCR. Internal validation conducted through a re-sampling without replacement procedure confirmed the robustness of the multivariate model. Finally, we found a significant association between pWee1 and pChk1. The message conveyed by the present analysis is that biomarkers of DNA damage and repair may predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. Further studies are warranted to prospectively validate these encouraging findings.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairBiomarkersCell Cycle ProteinsCervix UteriFemaleG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHistonesHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein-Tyrosine KinasesTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkersCell Cycle ProteinsH2AX protein, humanHistonesNuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesWEE1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26930412
PMCPMC4773222
OpenAlexW2291382299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.