Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26930275›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Integrated Analysis of Dysregulated ncRNA and mRNA Expression Profiles in Humans Exposed to Carbon Nanotubes.

Anna A Shvedova, Naveena Yanamala, Elena R Kisin, Timur O Khailullin, M Eileen Birch, Liliya M Fatkhutdinova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Noncoding RNA, friend or foe for nephrolithiasis?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunotoxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials, Starring Phagocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Understanding Nanomaterial-Induced Toxicity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna A ShvedovaExposure Assessment Branch/HELD/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV - 26505, United States of America.
Naveena YanamalaExposure Assessment Branch/HELD/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV - 26505, United States of America.
Elena R KisinExposure Assessment Branch/HELD/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV - 26505, United States of America.
Timur O KhailullinDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV -26505, United States of America.
M Eileen BirchNIOSH/CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH - 45226, United States of America.
Liliya M FatkhutdinovaDepartment of Hygiene and Occupational Health, Kazan State Medical University, ul. Butlerova 49, Kazan, 420012 Russia.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USKazan State Medical University · RUWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the application of carbon nanotubes (CNT) in consumer products continues to rise, studies have expanded to determine the associated risks of exposure on human and environmental health. In particular, several lines of evidence indicate that exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) could pose a carcinogenic risk similar to asbestos fibers. However, to date the potential markers of MWCNT exposure are not yet explored in humans.

methodsIn the present study, global mRNA and ncRNA expression profiles in the blood of exposed workers, having direct contact with MWCNT aerosol for at least 6 months (n = 8), were compared with expression profiles of non-exposed (n = 7) workers (e.g., professional and/or technical staff) from the same manufacturing facility.

resultsSignificant changes in the ncRNA and mRNA expression profiles were observed between exposed and non-exposed worker groups. An integrative analysis of ncRNA-mRNA correlations was performed to identify target genes, functional relationships, and regulatory networks in MWCNT-exposed workers. The coordinated changes in ncRNA and mRNA expression profiles revealed a set of miRNAs and their target genes with roles in cell cycle regulation/progression/control, apoptosis and proliferation. Further, the identified pathways and signaling networks also revealed MWCNT potential to trigger pulmonary and cardiovascular effects as well as carcinogenic outcomes in humans, similar to those previously described in rodents exposed to MWCNTs.

conclusionThis study is the first to investigate aberrant changes in mRNA and ncRNA expression profiles in the blood of humans exposed to MWCNT. The significant changes in several miRNAs and mRNAs expression as well as their regulatory networks are important for getting molecular insights into the MWCNT-induced toxicity and pathogenesis in humans. Further large-scale prospective studies are necessary to validate the potential applicability of such changes in mRNAs and miRNAs as prognostic markers of MWCNT exposures in humans.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMiddle AgedNanotubes, CarbonOccupational ExposureReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedTranscriptomeYoung AdultNanotubes, CarbonRNA, MessengerRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID26930275
PMCPMC4773015
OpenAlexW2290789750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.