Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26930191›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Occupation-Based Occupational Therapy Using the Aid for Decision Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for Older Residents: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hirofumi Nagayama, Kounosuke Tomori, Kanta Ohno, Kayoko Takahashi, Kakuya Ogahara, Tatsunori Sawada, Sei Uezu, Ryutaro Nagatani, Keita Yamauchi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Meaningful Activities and Psychosomatic Functions in Japanese Older Adults after Driving Cessation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. iPad Use in Stroke Neuro-Rehabilitation.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hirofumi NagayamaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kounosuke TomoriDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kanta OhnoGraduate Course of Health and Social, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kayoko TakahashiSchool of Allied Health, Department of Occupational Therapy, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kakuya OgaharaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsunori SawadaIMS Itabashi Rehabilitation Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sei UezuNaha City Ajya Complex Welfare Facility, Okinawa, Japan.
Ryutaro NagataniDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keita YamauchiGraduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kanagawa University of Human Services · JPKeio University · JPKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare-home residents are mostly inactive, have little interaction with staff, and are dependent on staff to engage in daily occupations. We recently developed an iPad application called the Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) to promote shared decision-making in activities and occupation-based goal setting by choosing from illustrations describing daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate if interventions based on occupation-based goal setting using the ADOC could focus on meaningful activities to improve quality of life and independent activities of daily living, with greater cost-effectiveness than an impairment-based approach as well as to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large cluster, randomized controlled trial.

methodIn this single (assessor)-blind pilot cluster randomized controlled trial, the intervention group (ADOC group) received occupational therapy based on occupation-based goal setting using the ADOC, and the interventions were focused on meaningful occupations. The control group underwent an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities, without goal setting tools. In both groups, the 20-minute individualized intervention sessions were conducted twice a week for 4 months.

main outcome measuresShort Form-36 (SF-36) score, SF-6D utility score, quality adjusted life years (QALY), Barthel Index, and total care cost.

resultsWe randomized and analyzed 12 facilities (44 participants, 18.5% drop-out rate), with 6 facilities each allocated to the ADOC (n = 23) and control (n = 21) groups. After the 4-month intervention, the ADOC group had a significantly greater change in the BI score, with improved scores (P = 0.027, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.87, intracluster correlation coefficient = 0.14). No other outcome was significantly different. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated using the change in BI score, was $63.1.

conclusionThe results suggest that occupational therapy using the ADOC for older residents might be effective and cost-effective. We also found that conducting an RCT in the occupational therapy setting is feasible.

trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000012994.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAged, 80 and overChoice BehaviorCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleOccupational TherapyOccupationsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsPsychometricsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID26930191
PMCPMC4773241
OpenAlexW2290982708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.