ArticleGM crops & food2015
Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.
Article in GM crops & food, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome editing for vegetable crop improvement: Challenges and future prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Genetically modified crops in Africa: progress, challenges, and future prospects.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Application of Omics Technologies for Cowpea Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Engineering crop determinacy: CRISPR/Cas based advances in self-pruning gene function and application.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Recent advances in generation of doubled haploid plants for genetic improvement in solanaceous vegetable crops.Planta · 2026Review
- The Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation: a gateway for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in leguminous.Transgenic research · 2025Review
- Review
- Genome editing in vegetable crops: a new era of sustainable agriculture.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Salt stress-responsive transcription factors provide insights to enhance barley improvement: a review.Planta · 2025Review
- Mainstreaming3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Accelerating crop improvement via integration of transcriptome-based network biology and genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- Advancing vegetable genetics with gene editing: a pathway to food security and nutritional resilience in climate-shifted environments.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Improving the Aroma of Millets by Targeting theCurrent genomics · 2025Review
- Genome editing in Sub-Saharan Africa: a game-changing strategy for climate change mitigation and sustainable agriculture.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 mediated understanding of plants' abiotic stress-responsive genes to combat changing climatic patterns.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Improving the Traits ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Exploring the landscape of public attitudes towards gene-edited foods in Japan.Breeding science · 2024Article
- Microalgae biofuels: illuminating the path to a sustainable future amidst challenges and opportunities.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Review
- Hybrid Fruits for Improving Health-A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome or gene editing includes several new techniques to help scientists precisely modify genome sequences. The techniques also enables us to alter the regulation of gene expression patterns in a pre-determined region and facilitates novel insights into the functional genomics of an organism. Emergence of genome editing has brought considerable excitement especially among agricultural scientists because of its simplicity, precision and power as it offers new opportunities to develop improved crop varieties with clear-cut addition of valuable traits or removal of undesirable traits. Research is underway to improve crop varieties with higher yields, strengthen stress tolerance, disease and pest resistance, decrease input costs, and increase nutritional value. Genome editing encompasses a wide variety of tools using either a site-specific recombinase (SSR) or a site-specific nuclease (SSN) system. Both systems require recognition of a known sequence. The SSN system generates single or double strand DNA breaks and activates endogenous DNA repair pathways. SSR technology, such as Cre/loxP and Flp/FRT mediated systems, are able to knockdown or knock-in genes in the genome of eukaryotes, depending on the orientation of the specific sites (loxP, FLP, etc.) flanking the target site. There are 4 main classes of SSN developed to cleave genomic sequences, mega-nucleases (homing endonuclease), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the CRISPR/Cas nuclease system (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated protein). The recombinase mediated genome engineering depends on recombinase (sub-) family and target-site and induces high frequencies of homologous recombination. Improving crops with gene editing provides a range of options: by altering only a few nucleotides from billions found in the genomes of living cells, altering the full allele or by inserting a new gene in a targeted region of the genome. Due to its precision, gene editing is more precise than either conventional crop breeding methods or standard genetic engineering methods. Thus this technology is a very powerful tool that can be used toward securing the world's food supply. In addition to improving the nutritional value of crops, it is the most effective way to produce crops that can resist pests and thrive in tough climates. There are 3 types of modifications produced by genome editing; Type I includes altering a few nucleotides, Type II involves replacing an allele with a pre-existing one and Type III allows for the insertion of new gene(s) in predetermined regions in the genome. Because most genome-editing techniques can leave behind traces of DNA alterations evident in a small number of nucleotides, crops created through gene editing could avoid the stringent regulation procedures commonly associated with GM crop development. For this reason many scientists believe plants improved with the more precise gene editing techniques will be more acceptable to the public than transgenic plants. With genome editing comes the promise of new crops being developed more rapidly with a very low risk of off-target effects. It can be performed in any laboratory with any crop, even those that have complex genomes and are not easily bred using conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.