Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26930069›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Variations in Multiple Birth Rates and Impact on Perinatal Outcomes in Europe.

Anna Heino, Mika Gissler, Ashna D Hindori-Mohangoo, Béatrice Blondel, Kari Klungsøyr, Ivan Verdenik, Ewa Mierzejewska, Petr Velebil, Helga Sól Ólafsdóttir, Alison Macfarlane and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna HeinoTHL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika GisslerTHL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Ashna D Hindori-MohangooTNO, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Department Child Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Béatrice BlondelINSERM, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (U1153), Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Kari KlungsøyrDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen and Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5018, Bergen, Norway.
Ivan VerdenikLjubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ewa MierzejewskaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Research Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Petr VelebilInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Helga Sól ÓlafsdóttirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Alison MacfarlaneCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, Great Britain.
Jennifer ZeitlinINSERM, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (U1153), Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInfants from multiple pregnancies have higher rates of preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal death and differences in multiple birth rates (MBR) exist between countries. We aimed to describe differences in MBR in Europe and to investigate the impact of these differences on adverse perinatal outcomes at a population level.

methodsWe used national aggregate birth data on multiple pregnancies, maternal age, gestational age (GA), stillbirth and neonatal death collected in the Euro-Peristat project (29 countries in 2010, N = 5 074 643 births). We also used European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) data on assisted conception and single embryo transfer (SET). The impact of MBR on outcomes was studied using meta-analysis techniques with random-effects models to derive pooled risk ratios (pRR) overall and for four groups of country defined by their MBR. We computed population attributable risks (PAR) for these groups.

resultsIn 2010, the average MBR was 16.8 per 1000 women giving birth, ranging from 9.1 (Romania) to 26.5 (Cyprus). Compared to singletons, multiples had a nine-fold increased risk (pRR 9.4, 95% Cl 9.1-9.8) of preterm birth (<37 weeks GA), an almost 12-fold increased risk (pRR 11.7, 95% CI 11.0-12.4) of very preterm birth (<32 weeks GA). Pooled RR were 2.4 (95% Cl 1.5-3.6) for fetal mortality at or after 28 weeks GA and 7.0 (95% Cl 6.1-8.0) for neonatal mortality. PAR of neonatal death and very preterm birth were higher in countries with high MBR compared to low MBR (17.1% (95% CI 13.8-20.2) versus 9.8% (95% Cl 9.6-11.0) for neonatal death and 29.6% (96% CI 28.5-30.6) versus 17.5% (95% CI 15.7-18.3) for very preterm births, respectively).

conclusionsWide variations in MBR and their impact on population outcomes imply that efforts by countries to reduce MBR could improve perinatal outcomes, enabling better long-term child health.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathPregnancy, MultipleAdultBirth RateEuropeFemaleFetal DeathFetal MortalityHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal AgePregnancyPremature BirthStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID26930069
PMCPMC4773186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.