ReviewJournal of comparative effectiveness research2016
Patient and clinician support for the learning healthcare system: recommendations for enhancing value.
Review in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to patient and public involvement in developing learning health systems within community health services: ascoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Structuring Collaboration Between Researchers and Operational Innovators: Diffusing New Practices Across the Veteran's Administration Healthcare System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- The role of patients, caregivers, and communities in Learning Health Systems: a narrative review.Frontiers in health services · 2025Review
- Article
- A Learning Healthcare System for pregnant and breastfeeding women: what do women during preconception, pregnancy, and nursing think? - A qualitative study : A contribution from the ConcePTION project.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Clarifying the concept of a learning health system for healthcare delivery organizations: Implications from a qualitative analysis of the scientific literature.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- One size does not fit all: Insights for engaging front-line clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- Options for Meaningful Engagement in Clinical Research for Busy Frontline Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Stakeholder perspectives regarding alternate approaches to informed consent for comparative effectiveness research.Learning health systems · 2018Article
- Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Article
- Understanding practice-based research participation: The differing motivations of engaged vs. non-engaged clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2016Article
- Tale of Two Centres-Exploring Bedside Challenges to Implementing a Clinical Quality Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Metropolitan Australia.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.