Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929820›Full record

ReviewExtreme physiology & medicine2016

'Blood doping' from Armstrong to prehabilitation: manipulation of blood to improve performance in athletes and physiological reserve in patients.

James O M Plumb, James M Otto, Michael P W Grocott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Extreme physiology & medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James O M PlumbAnaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK ; Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, UK ; Critical Care Research Area, Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK ; Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 801 South Academic Block, Tremona Road Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK.
James M OttoDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science c/o, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health (ISEH), 170 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
Michael P W GrocottAnaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK ; Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, UK ; Critical Care Research Area, Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK ; Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 801 South Academic Block, Tremona Road Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK.
English Institute of Sport · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haemoglobin is the blood's oxygen carrying pigment and is encapsulated in red blood corpuscles. The concentration of haemoglobin in blood is dependent on both its total mass in the circulation (tHb-mass) and the total plasma volume in which it is suspended. Aerobic capacity is defined as the maximum amount of oxygen that can be consumed by the body per unit time and is one measure of physical fitness. Observations in athletes who have undergone blood doping or manipulation have revealed a closer relationship between physical fitness (aerobic capacity) and total haemoglobin mass (tHb-mass) than with haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]). Anaemia is defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a haemoglobin concentration of <130 g/L for men and <120 g/L for women. Perioperative anaemia is a common problem and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity following surgery. Aerobic capacity is also associated with outcome following major surgery, with less fit patients having a higher incidence of mortality and morbidity after surgery. Taken together, these observations suggest that targeted preoperative elevation of tHb-mass may raise aerobic capacity both directly and indirectly (by augmenting preoperative exercise initiatives- 'prehabilitation') and thus improve postoperative outcome. This notion in turn raises a number of questions. Which measure ([Hb] or tHb-mass) has the most value for the description of oxygen carrying capacity? Which measure has the most utility for targeting therapies to manipulate haemoglobin levels? Do the newer agents being used for blood manipulation (to increase tHb-mass) in elite sport have utility in the clinical environment? This review explores the literature relating to blood manipulation in elite sport as well as the relationship between perioperative anaemia, physical fitness and outcome following surgery, and suggests some avenues for exploring this area further.

Indexed as

AltitudeAnaemiaAutologous blood transfusionBlood dopingBlood manipulationCycling[Formula: see text]O2maxHypoxia-inducible factorsPerioperativePrehabilitationRecombinant human erythropoietin rHuEPOSurgerySurgical outcomesTotal haemoglobin mass

Identifiers

PMID26929820
PMCPMC4770708
OpenAlexW2292739162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.