ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2016
The Significance of Ras Activity in Pancreatic Cancer Initiation.
Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do We Have Enough Evidence That Metformin Is Superior to Other Antidiabetic Drugs in Pancreatic Cancer Risk Reduction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Germline Variants and Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Emerging Concepts.Pancreas · 2018Pooled it
- Novel paradigms in KRAS targeting: Unveiling strategies to combat drug resistance.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Weight-centric prevention of cancer.Obesity pillars · 2024Review
- Early elevations of RAS protein level and activity are critical for the development of PDAC in the context of inflammation.Cancer letters · 2024Article
- Inhibition of ADAM9 promotes the selective degradation of KRAS and sensitizes pancreatic cancers to chemotherapy.Nature cancer · 2024Article
- Targeting KRAS in pancreatic cancer.Oncology research · 2024Review
- Overview of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-Targeting Radiolabelled Imaging Probes from Preclinical Perspective: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Key transcriptional effectors of the pancreatic acinar phenotype and oncogenic transformation.PloS one · 2023Article
- Pancreatic Tumorigenesis: Precursors, Genetic Risk Factors and Screening.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Differential Effects of Dietary Macronutrients on the Development of Oncogenic KRAS-Mediated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2022Article
- Resistance to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Physiopathologic and Pharmacologic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- The Influence of Oncogenic RAS on Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Resistance Through DNA Repair Pathways.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- KrasGenome biology · 2021Article
- Obesity and Pancreatic Cancer: Insight into Mechanisms.Cancers · 2021Review
- Targeting KRAS in pancreatic cancer: new drugs on the horizon.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2021Review
- Impact of surgery for chronic pancreatitis on the risk of pancreatic cancer: Untying the Gordian knot.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Pancreatic Tumorigenesis: Oncogenic KRAS and the Vulnerability of the Pancreas to Obesity.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic landscape of pancreatic cancer shows nearly ubiquitous mutations of K-RAS. However, oncogenic K-Ras(mt) alone is not sufficient to lead to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in either human or in genetically modified adult mouse models. Many stimulants, such as high fat diet, CCK, LPS, PGE2 and others, have physiological effects at low concentrations that are mediated in part through modest increases in K-Ras activity. However, at high concentrations, they induce inflammation that, in the presence of oncogenic K-Ras expression, substantially accelerates PDAC formation. The mechanism involves increased activity of oncogenic K-Ras(mt). Unlike what has been proposed in the standard paradigm for the role of Ras in oncogenesis, oncogenic K-Ras(mt) is now known to not be constitutively active. Rather, it can be activated by standard mechanisms similar to wild-type K-Ras, but its activity is sustained for a prolonged period. Furthermore, if the level of K-Ras activity exceeds a threshold at which it begins to generate its own activators, then a feed-forward loop is formed between K-Ras activity and inflammation and pathological processes including oncogenesis are initiated. Oncogenic K-Ras(mt) activation, a key event in PDAC initiation and development, is subject to complex regulatory mechanisms. Reagents which inhibit inflammation, such as the Cox2 inhibitor celecoxib, block the feed-forward loop and prevent induction of PDAC in models with endogenous oncogenic K-Ras(mt). Increased understanding of the role of activating and inhibitory mechanisms on oncogenic K-Ras(mt) activity is of paramount importance for the development of preventive and therapeutic strategies to fight against this lethal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.