Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929662›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2016

The pharmacogenomics of pain management: prospects for personalized medicine.

Sonya Ting, Stephan Schug

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacogenomics and Morphine.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Update on the pharmacogenomics of pain management.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Update of the Scientific Opinion on opium alkaloids in poppy seeds.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonya TingDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Stephan SchugAnaesthesiology Unit, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia Anaesthesiology Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a common symptom that can be complex to treat. Analgesic medications are the mainstay treatment, but there is wide interindividual variability in analgesic response and adverse effects. Pharmacogenomics is the study of inherited genetic traits that result in these individual responses to drugs. This narrative review will attempt to cover the current understanding of the pharmacogenomics of pain, examining common genes affecting metabolism of analgesic medications, their distribution throughout the body, and end organ effects.

Indexed as

COMTcytochrome P450inherited traitspharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID26929662
PMCPMC4755469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.