Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929611›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2016

A retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Feng Jin, Hui Zhu, Fang Shi, Li Kong, Jinming Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Clinical Research on Albumin-bound Paclitaxel-based Therapy in Advanced Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng JinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Hui ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Fang ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Li KongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the anticancer effect and toxicity of weekly administered nab-paclitaxel as a second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with relapsed squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the treatment of 42 elderly patients with relapsed squamous NSCLC, who received nab-paclitaxel monotherapy as a second-line treatment from January 2010 to March 2014. A dose of 100 mg/m(2) nab-paclitaxel was administered weekly on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by 1 week of rest. The protocol was maintained for at least two cycles.

resultsThe overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 21.43% (9/42) and 47.62% (20/42), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.6 and 10.9 months, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS, accounting for the first-line therapy factors (taxane agent, radiotherapy, or surgery). There was a statistically significant difference in DCR for stages III and IV (62.96% vs 20%, P=0.008), but there was no such difference in either PFS or OS. The ORR of 29 patients receiving more than three cycles of treatment was higher than that of those receiving less than three cycles of treatment (31.03% vs 0%, P=0.038), and there was a significant difference in PFS (7.6 vs 4.9 months, P=0.004) and OS (11.7 vs 8.9 months, P=0.002). No hypersensitivity reactions or treatment-related grade 4 adverse events were reported.

conclusionNab-paclitaxel monotherapy administered weekly at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) is shown to be an effective and safe regimen for elderly patients with relapsed squamous NSCLC, especially for patients with stage III disease or good performance status.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChinaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsPaclitaxelelderlynab-paclitaxelnon-small-cell lung cancersecond linesquamous

Identifiers

PMID26929611
PMCPMC4767057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.