Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929609›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2016

Physicians' perspectives on the treatment of osteoporosis patients with bisphosphonates.

Tao Gu, Debra F Eisenberg Lawrence, Judith J Stephenson, Jingbo Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Osteoporosis medication after fracture in older adults: an administrative data analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  2. Temporal Trends and Factors Associated with Bisphosphonate Discontinuation and Restart.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Article
  3. Understanding patients' preferences for osteoporosis treatment: the impact of patients' characteristics on subgroups and latent classes.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao GuHealthCore, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Debra F Eisenberg LawrenceHealthCore, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Judith J StephensonHealthCore, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jingbo YuMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Wilmington University · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoncompliance with bisphosphonate therapy among osteoporosis patients attenuates the reduction of fracture risk. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' prescribing considerations, preferences for osteoporosis treatments, and perceptions of patients' compliance with oral bisphosphonates.

methodsThis was an online survey of US physicians identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) as prescribing oral bisphosphonates to women aged ≥55 years. The survey gauged physicians' prescribing considerations and preferences for various types of osteoporosis medications. The physicians were asked to predict patient persistence and compliance, and rate various reasons for noncompliance.

resultsBone mineral density, long-term medication use (eg, corticosteroids), and a history of fracture were ranked as major considerations by 94.9%, 88.6%, and 86.7% of participating physicians (N=158), respectively, when deciding whether to treat an osteoporosis patient. Most physicians expressed a preference for prescribing weekly or monthly oral bisphosphonates, for both newly diagnosed patients (54.4% and 34.2%, respectively) and long-term users of oral bisphosphonates (40.5% and 36.1%, respectively). Most physicians (23.4% always, 58.9% sometimes) incorporated a drug holiday into their prescribing patterns. Although most physicians predicted that more than half of the patients would comply with the prescribed medication for at least a year, 17.7% predicted that less than half of the patients would be compliant in the 1st year, and 29.7% predicted the same result for compliance beyond 1 year. In the opinion of the majority of physicians, the major reasons for noncompliance with oral bisphosphonates were intolerance of a medication due to a gastrointestinal condition (71.5%) and medication side effects (69.6%).

conclusionUS physicians consider several relevant risk factors when deciding whether to prescribe pharmacotherapy and exhibit a preference for weekly or monthly regimens. The physicians estimated a substantial minority of the patients to be noncompliant with oral bisphosphonates, for reasons including primarily gastrointestinal intolerance and medication-related side effects.

Indexed as

AdultBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPatient CompliancePhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesbisphosphonatescross-sectional studiesosteoporosispatient compliancephysician’s practice patterns

Identifiers

PMID26929609
PMCPMC4760663
OpenAlexW2287939816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.