Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929560›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2016

A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.

M Shyamala, C Ramesh, V Yuvaraj, V Suresh, R SathyaNarayanan, T S Balaji, M Neil Dominic, B Nithin Joseph Jude

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ShyamalaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
C RameshDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
V YuvarajDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
V SureshDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
R SathyaNarayananDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
T S BalajiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
M Neil DominicDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
B Nithin Joseph JudeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Post Office, Puducherry, 607402 India.
Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. STUDY

designAll the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.

Indexed as

AlkalinisationBupicaineImpacted third molar

Identifiers

PMID26929560
PMCPMC4759020
OpenAlexW396800307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.