Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929430›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles.

Kori A LaDonna, Joanna Bates, Glendon R Tait, Allan McDougall, Valerie Schulz, Lorelei Lingard, Heart Failure/Palliative Care Teamwork Research Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Appropriating and asserting power on inflammatory arthritis teams: A social network perspective.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How oncology teams can be patient-centred? opportunities for theoretical improvement through an empirical examination.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  13. The different perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and professionals on patient involvement in primary care teams. A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kori A LaDonnaCentre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Joanna BatesDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Glendon R TaitDepartment of Psychiatry and Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Allan McDougallCentre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Valerie SchulzDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Lorelei LingardCentre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Heart Failure/Palliative Care Teamwork Research Group

Funding

CIHR 123234-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex, chronically ill patients require interprofessional teams to address their multiple health needs; heart failure (HF) is an iconic example of this growing problem. While patients are the common denominator in interprofessional care teams, patients have not explicitly informed our understanding of team composition and function. Their perspectives are crucial for improving quality, patient-centred care.

objectivesTo explore how individuals with HF conceptualize their care team, and perceive team members' roles. SETTING AND

participantsIndividuals with advanced HF were recruited from five cities in three Canadian provinces.

designIndividuals were asked to identify their HF care team during semi-structured interviews. Team members' titles and roles, quotes pertaining to team composition and function, and frailty criteria were extracted and analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

resultsA total of 62 individuals with HF identified 2-19 team members. Caregivers, nurses, family physicians and cardiologists were frequently identified; teams also included dentists, foot care specialists, drivers, housekeepers and spiritual advisors. Most individuals met frailty criteria and described participating in self-management. DISCUSSION: Individuals with HF perceived being active participants, not passive recipients, of care. They identified teams that were larger and more diverse than traditional biomedical conceptualizations. However, the nature and importance of team members' roles varied according to needs, relationships and context. Patients' degree of agency was negotiated within this context, causing multiple, sometimes conflicting, responses.

conclusionIgnoring the patient's role on the care team may contribute to fragmented care. However, understanding the team through the patient's lens - and collaborating meaningfully among identified team members - may improve health-care delivery.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPatient SatisfactionProfessional RoleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleHeart FailureHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchchronic diseasefrailtyheart failureinterprofessional teamspatient-centred carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID26929430
PMCPMC5354030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.