Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929337›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Mechanisms of backtrack recovery by RNA polymerases I and II.

Ana Lisica, Christoph Engel, Marcus Jahnel, Édgar Roldán, Eric A Galburt, Patrick Cramer, Stephan W Grill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Heterogeneous template-dependent transcription dynamics of T7 RNAP revealed by single-molecule imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Molecule Approaches to Study DNA Condensation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana LisicaBiotechnology Center, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
Christoph EngelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany;
Marcus JahnelBiotechnology Center, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
Édgar RoldánMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden (cfaed), 01062 Dresden, Germany; Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), 28040 Madrid, Spain;
Eric A GalburtDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Patrick CramerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany;
Stephan W GrillBiotechnology Center, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; stephan.grill@biotec.tu-dresden.de.
TU Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DEMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems · DEWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

European Research Council 281903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During DNA transcription, RNA polymerases often adopt inactive backtracked states. Recovery from backtracks can occur by 1D diffusion or cleavage of backtracked RNA, but how polymerases make this choice is unknown. Here, we use single-molecule optical tweezers experiments and stochastic theory to show that the choice of a backtrack recovery mechanism is determined by a kinetic competition between 1D diffusion and RNA cleavage. Notably, RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and Pol II recover from shallow backtracks by 1D diffusion, use RNA cleavage to recover from intermediary depths, and are unable to recover from extensive backtracks. Furthermore, Pol I and Pol II use distinct mechanisms to avoid nonrecoverable backtracking. Pol I is protected by its subunit A12.2, which decreases the rate of 1D diffusion and enables transcript cleavage up to 20 nt. In contrast, Pol II is fully protected through association with the cleavage stimulatory factor TFIIS, which enables rapid recovery from any depth by RNA cleavage. Taken together, we identify distinct backtrack recovery strategies of Pol I and Pol II, shedding light on the evolution of cellular functions of these key enzymes.

Indexed as

DiffusionModels, ChemicalMotionOptical TweezersProtein BindingProtein SubunitsRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence DeletionStochastic ProcessesTimeTranscriptional Elongation FactorsProtein SubunitsRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscriptional Elongation Factorstranscription factor S-IIbacktrackingoptical tweezersPol IPol IItranscription

Identifiers

PMID26929337
PMCPMC4801279
OpenAlexW2288589354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.