Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929301›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2016

Friendly Fire: Biological Functions and Consequences of Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Gary E Heussler, George A O'Toole

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. It's time to write a minireview.Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CRISPR-influenced symbiosis.Nature microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Basis for Natural Multiresistance to Phage inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Potent CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitors fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A matter of background: DNA repair pathways as a possible cause for the sparse distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. An anti-CRISPR protein disables type V Cas12a by acetylation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The CRISPR-Cas9 system in Neisseria spp.Pathogens and disease · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gary E HeusslerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
George A O'TooleDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA georgeo@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

cdiGMP regulation of Biofilm FormationR37AI083256 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI O'TOOLE, GEORGE A. · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
Molecular mechanism regulating periplasmic proteolysis in bacterial pathogenesisR01AI097307 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI O'TOOLE, GEORGE A., SONDERMANN, HOLGER · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097307NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI083256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) systems in bacteria and archaea target foreign elements, such as bacteriophages and conjugative plasmids, through the incorporation of short sequences (termed spacers) from the foreign element into the CRISPR array, thereby allowing sequence-specific targeting of the invader. Thus, CRISPR-Cas systems are typically considered a microbial adaptive immune system. While many of these incorporated spacers match targets on bacteriophages and plasmids, a noticeable number are derived from chromosomal DNA. While usually lethal to the self-targeting bacteria, in certain circumstances, these self-targeting spacers can have profound effects in regard to microbial biology, including functions beyond adaptive immunity. In this minireview, we discuss recent studies that focus on the functions and consequences of CRISPR-Cas self-targeting, including reshaping of the host population, group behavior modification, and the potential applications of CRISPR-Cas self-targeting as a tool in microbial biotechnology. Understanding the effects of CRISPR-Cas self-targeting is vital to fully understanding the spectrum of function of these systems.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacteriaBacteriophagesChromosomes, BacterialGene Targeting

Identifiers

PMID26929301
PMCPMC4859606
OpenAlexW2290768271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.