Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26929245›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

Widespread Impact of Chromosomal Inversions on Gene Expression Uncovers Robustness via Phenotypic Buffering.

Samina Naseeb, Zorana Carter, David Minnis, Ian Donaldson, Leo Zeef, Daniela Delneri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. New cytogenetic data onParasitology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Adaptation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Whole Genome Sequencing,G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. History of genome editing in yeast.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samina NaseebComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Zorana CarterComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David MinnisComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ian DonaldsonComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Leo ZeefComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Daniela DelneriComputational and Evolutionary Biology Research Theme, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom d.delneri@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008908/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonrandom gene organization in eukaryotes plays a significant role in genome evolution and function. Chromosomal structural changes impact meiotic fitness and, in several organisms, are associated with speciation and rapid adaptation to different environments. Small sized chromosomal inversions, encompassing few genes, are pervasive in Saccharomyces "sensu stricto" species, while larger inversions are less common in yeasts compared with higher eukaryotes. To explore the effect of gene order on phenotype, reproductive isolation, and gene expression, we engineered 16 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains carrying all possible paracentric and pericentric inversions between Ty1 elements, a natural substrate for rearrangements. We found that 4 inversions were lethal, while the other 12 did not show any fitness advantage or disadvantage in rich and minimal media. At meiosis, only a weak negative correlation with fitness was seen with the size of the inverted region. However, significantly lower fertility was seen in heterozygote invertant strains carrying recombination hotspots within the breakpoints. Altered transcription was observed throughout the genome rather than being overrepresented within the inversions. In spite of the large difference in gene expression in the inverted strains, mitotic fitness was not impaired in the majority of the 94 conditions tested, indicating that the robustness of the expression network buffers the deleterious effects of structural changes in several environments. Overall, our results support the notion that transcriptional changes may compensate for Ty-mediated rearrangements resulting in the maintenance of a constant phenotype, and suggest that large inversions in yeast are unlikely to be a selectable trait during vegetative growth.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionGene OrderBiological EvolutionChromosomes, FungalChromosome StructuresEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGene RearrangementGenomeMeiosisPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaefitnessgenome organisationinversionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae.

Identifiers

PMID26929245
PMCPMC4915352
OpenAlexW2290078691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.