ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2016
Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains.
Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based placental clusters and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2023Article
- Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review.International health · 2022Article
- Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review.Contemporary nurse · 2022Review
- Association of Prenatal Exposure to Maternal Drinking and Smoking With the Risk of Stillbirth.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- State health disparities research in Rural America: Gaps and future directions in an era of COVID-19.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021Article
- Inclusion of American Indians and Alaskan Natives in Large National Studies: Ethical Considerations and Implications for Biospecimen Collection in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study.Adversity and resilience science · 2020Article
- Fostering Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research in Tribal Communities: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2020Article
- Concurrent prenatal drinking and smoking increases risk for SIDS: Safe Passage Study report.EClinicalMedicine · 2020Article
- Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research-A Scoping Review.Social sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health's Partnership River of Life: Special Issue Introduction.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2019Article
- Data Management in Health-Related Research Involving Indigenous Communities in the United States and Canada: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Tribal IRBs: A Framework for Understanding Research Oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2019Article
- Perspectives on Biological Monitoring in Environmental Health Research: A Focus Group Study in a Native American Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- A modified Timeline Followback assessment to capture alcohol exposure in pregnant women: Application in the Safe Passage Study.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Drinking and smoking patterns during pregnancy: Development of group-based trajectories in the Safe Passage Study.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Single IRB Review and Local Context Considerations: A Scoping Review.Ethics & human researchArticle
- Navigating University Openness in Research Policy Inconsistent with Indigenous Data Sovereignty: A Case Analysis.Ethics & human researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasingly, Tribal Nations are forming ethics review panels, which function separately from institutional review boards (IRBs). The emergence of strong community representation coincides with a widespread effort supported by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and other federal agencies to establish a single IRB for all multi-site research. This article underscores the value of a tribal ethics review board and describes the tribal oversight for the Safe Passage Study-a multi-site, community-based project in the Northern Plains. Our experience demonstrates the benefits of tribal ethics review and makes a strong argument for including tribal oversight in future regulatory guidance for multi-site, community-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.