ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Training Excitatory-Inhibitory Recurrent Neural Networks for Cognitive Tasks: A Simple and Flexible Framework.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
135 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence of functionally differentiated structures via mutual information minimization in recurrent neural networks.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Selective perturbation of mirror and non-mirror neurons in an in silico model of the action observation network.iScience · 2026Article
- Pretraining of Embodied Recurrent Networks Bridges the Gap Between Artificial and Cortical Neural Activities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasible cognition requires latent state.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Data-driven reduced modeling of neural dynamics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Disinhibitory signaling enables flexible coding of top-down information in cortical networks.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Neural timescales from a computational perspective.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- A computational architecture incorporating shallow brain networks: integrating parallel cortical and subcortical processing.Current research in neurobiology · 2026Article
- Association-sensory spatiotemporal hierarchy and functional gradient-regularised recurrent neural network with implications for schizophrenia.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Balancing Stability and Flow in Hippocampal Networks via Inductive Bias and Learned Symmetry Breaking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Neuromodulators Generate Multiple Context-Relevant Behaviors in Recurrent Neural Networks.Neural computation · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as a surrogate brain: bridging neural dynamical models and data.National science review · 2026Review
- Article
- Constructing biologically constrained RNNs via Dale's backpropagation and topologically informed pruning.Science advances · 2025Article
- A neural circuit framework for economic choice: from building blocks of valuation to compositionality in multitasking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sequential temporal anticipation characterized by neural power modulation and in recurrent neural networks.eLife · 2025Article
- Linear and categorical coding units in the mouse gustatory cortex drive population dynamics and behavior in taste decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Diverse and flexible behavioral strategies arise in recurrent neural networks trained on multisensory decision making.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to simultaneously record from large numbers of neurons in behaving animals has ushered in a new era for the study of the neural circuit mechanisms underlying cognitive functions. One promising approach to uncovering the dynamical and computational principles governing population responses is to analyze model recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that have been optimized to perform the same tasks as behaving animals. Because the optimization of network parameters specifies the desired output but not the manner in which to achieve this output, "trained" networks serve as a source of mechanistic hypotheses and a testing ground for data analyses that link neural computation to behavior. Complete access to the activity and connectivity of the circuit, and the ability to manipulate them arbitrarily, make trained networks a convenient proxy for biological circuits and a valuable platform for theoretical investigation. However, existing RNNs lack basic biological features such as the distinction between excitatory and inhibitory units (Dale's principle), which are essential if RNNs are to provide insights into the operation of biological circuits. Moreover, trained networks can achieve the same behavioral performance but differ substantially in their structure and dynamics, highlighting the need for a simple and flexible framework for the exploratory training of RNNs. Here, we describe a framework for gradient descent-based training of excitatory-inhibitory RNNs that can incorporate a variety of biological knowledge. We provide an implementation based on the machine learning library Theano, whose automatic differentiation capabilities facilitate modifications and extensions. We validate this framework by applying it to well-known experimental paradigms such as perceptual decision-making, context-dependent integration, multisensory integration, parametric working memory, and motor sequence generation. Our results demonstrate the wide range of neural activity patterns and behavior that can be modeled, and suggest a unified setting in which diverse cognitive computations and mechanisms can be studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.