ArticleMalaria journal2016
Human malaria diagnosis using a single-step direct-PCR based on the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase III gene.
Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overreliance on Plasmodium 18S rRNA gene for malaria molecular diagnosis-inferences from systematic review.Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent for Control of Malaria in Indonesia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Trial
- Research progress on direct PCR and its applications.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Review
- Zoonotic and Anthroponotic Plasmodium spp. Circulation between Wild Primates and Indigenous Community, Peruvian Amazon, 2007-2020.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Molecular Screening ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Malaria Vectors andTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Advances in Malaria Diagnostic Methods in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Malaria infection among adults residing in a highly endemic region from the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- An active and targeted survey reveals asymptomatic malaria infections among high-risk populations in Mondulkiri, Cambodia.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Malaria therapeutics: are we close enough?Parasites & vectors · 2023Review
- Pf7: an open dataset ofWellcome open research · 2023Article
- The primate malaria parasites Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium brasilianum and Plasmodium ovale spp.: genomic insights into distribution, dispersal and host transitions.Malaria journal · 2022Review
- A direct, sensitive and high-throughput genus and species-specific molecular assay for large-scale malaria screening.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Article
- An open dataset ofWellcome open research · 2022Article
- The Comparison of PCR Kits for the Detection of Erythrocytic Parasites on Filter Paper.Journal of tropical medicine · 2022Article
- Multilayer Thin-Film Optical Filters for Reflectance-Based Malaria Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Polymorphism Analysis ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Methods for Non-Falciparum Malaria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- An open dataset ofWellcome open research · 2021Article
- Ultrasensitive CRISPR-based diagnostic for field-applicable detection ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNested PCRs based on the Plasmodium 18s-rRNA gene have been extensively used for human malaria diagnosis. However, they are not practical when large quantities of samples need to be processed, further there have been challenges in the performance and when interpreting results, especially when submicroscopic infections are analysed. Here the use of "direct PCR" was investigated with the aim of improving diagnosis in the malaria elimination era.
methodsThe performance of the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase III gene (COX-III) based novel malaria detection strategies (direct nested PCR and direct single PCR) were compared using a 18s-rRNA direct nested PCR as a reference tool. Evaluations were based on sensitivity, specificity and the ability to detect mixed infections using control blood spot samples and field collected blood samples with final species diagnosis confirmation by sequencing.
resultsThe COX-III direct PCR (limit of detection: 0.6-2 parasites/μL) was more sensitive than the 18s-rRNA direct nested PCR (limit of detection: 2-10 parasites/μL). The COX-III direct PCR identified all 21 positive controls (no mixed infections detected) while the 18s-rRNA direct nested PCR identified 18/21 (including four mixed infections). Different concentrations of simulated mixed infections (Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum) suggest that the COX-III direct PCR detects only the predominant species. When the 18s-rRNA direct nested PCR was used to detect Plasmodium in field collected bloods spots (n = 3833), there was discrepancy in the results from the genus PCR (16 % positive) and the species-specific PCR (5 % positive). Further, a large portion of a subset of these positive samples (93 % for genus and 60 % for P. vivax), did not align with Plasmodium sequences. In contrast, the COX-III direct PCR clearly identified (single bands confirmed with sequencing) 2 % positive Plasmodium samples including P. vivax, P. falciparum, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri.
conclusionsThe COX-III single direct PCR is an alternative method for accurate detection of Plasmodium microscopic and submicroscopic infections in humans, especially when a large number of samples require screening. This PCR does not require DNA isolation, is sensitive, quick, produces confident/clear results, identifies all the Plasmodium species infecting humans, and is cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.