Individual gene expression and personalised medicine in sepsis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Promotion of vascular integrity in sepsis through modulation of bioactive adrenomedullin and dipeptidyl peptidase 3.Journal of internal medicine · 2021
   Review
2. The challenge of recognising sepsis: Future nanotechnology solutions.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2020
   Review
3. Identification of key miRNA‑mRNA pairs in septic mice by bioinformatics analysis.Molecular medicine reports · 2019
   Article
4. ED Door-to-Antibiotic Time and Long-term Mortality in Sepsis.Chest · 2019
   Article
5. Effects of the timing of administration of IgM- and IgA-enriched intravenous polyclonal immunoglobulins on the outcome of septic shock patients.Annals of intensive care · 2018
   Article
6. The coming era of precision medicine for intensive care.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
   Review
7. A path to precision in the ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
   Review
8. Improved survival in critically ill patients: are large RCTs more useful than personalized medicine? No.Intensive care medicine · 2016
   Article
9. Genomics and pharmacogenomics of sepsis: so close and yet so far.Critical care (London, England) · 2016
   Article
10. The Berlin definition met our needs: not sure.Intensive care medicine · 2016
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Genomic landscape of the individual host response and outcomes in sepsis: a prospective cohort study.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as