Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26928298›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

A Multi-Method Approach for Proteomic Network Inference in 11 Human Cancers.

Yasin Şenbabaoğlu, Selçuk Onur Sümer, Francisco Sánchez-Vega, Debra Bemis, Giovanni Ciriello, Nikolaus Schultz, Chris Sander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasin ŞenbabaoğluComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Selçuk Onur SümerComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Francisco Sánchez-VegaComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Debra BemisComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Giovanni CirielloComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Nikolaus SchultzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Chris SanderComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
MSKCC Center for Translational Cancer Genomic AnalysisU24CA143840 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC, SANDER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2016
$11.5M
Pathway Commons: Research Resource for Biological PathwaysU41HG006623 · NHGRI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2012 to 2017
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143840NCI NIH HHS U24CA143840NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006623NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein expression and post-translational modification levels are tightly regulated in neoplastic cells to maintain cellular processes known as 'cancer hallmarks'. The first Pan-Cancer initiative of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has aggregated protein expression profiles for 3,467 patient samples from 11 tumor types using the antibody based reverse phase protein array (RPPA) technology. The resultant proteomic data can be utilized to computationally infer protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and to study the commonalities and differences across tumor types. In this study, we compare the performance of 13 established network inference methods in their capacity to retrieve the curated Pathway Commons interactions from RPPA data. We observe that no single method has the best performance in all tumor types, but a group of six methods, including diverse techniques such as correlation, mutual information, and regression, consistently rank highly among the tested methods. We utilize the high performing methods to obtain a consensus network; and identify four robust and densely connected modules that reveal biological processes as well as suggest antibody-related technical biases. Mapping the consensus network interactions to Reactome gene lists confirms the pan-cancer importance of signal transduction pathways, innate and adaptive immune signaling, cell cycle, metabolism, and DNA repair; and also suggests several biological processes that may be specific to a subset of tumor types. Our results illustrate the utility of the RPPA platform as a tool to study proteomic networks in cancer.

Indexed as

SoftwareCluster AnalysisDatabases, ProteinGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein Interaction MapsProteomicsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26928298
PMCPMC4771175
OpenAlexW2949122516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.