Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26928282›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2017

Validation of the SCOFF questionnaire for screening of eating disorders among Mexican university students.

Omar Sanchez-Armass, Marcela Raffaelli, Flavia Cristina Drumond Andrade, Angela R Wiley, Aida Nacielli Morales Noyola, Alejandra Cepeda Arguelles, Celia Aradillas-Garcia

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar Sanchez-ArmassSchool of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Carretera Central Km. 424.5, 78494, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. omarsac@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-2502
Marcela RaffaelliDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003 Doris Kelley Christopher Hall, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Flavia Cristina Drumond AndradeDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Huff Hall, 1206 S. Fourth St., Champaign, IL, 6182, USA.
Angela R WileyDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003 Doris Kelley Christopher Hall, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Aida Nacielli Morales NoyolaSchool of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Carretera Central Km. 424.5, 78494, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Alejandra Cepeda ArguellesSchool of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Carretera Central Km. 424.5, 78494, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Celia Aradillas-GarciaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Avenida Venustiano Carranza No 2405., Col. Los filtros, 7821, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MXUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the criterion validity and diagnostic utility of the SCOFF, a brief eating disorder (ED) screening instrument, in a Mexican sample.

methodsThe study was conducted in two phases in 2012. Phase I involved the administration of self-report measures [the SCOFF and the Eating Disorder Inventory-2, (EDI-2)] to 1057 students aged 17-56 years (M age = 21.0, SD = 3.4; 67 % female) from three colleges at the Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Mexico. In Phase II, a random subsample of these students (n = 104) participated in the eating disorder examination, a structured interview that yields ED diagnoses. Analyses were conducted to evaluate the SCOFF's criterion validity by examining (a) correlations between scores on the SCOFF and the EDI-2 and (b) the SCOFF's ability to differentiate diagnosed ED cases and non-cases.

resultsEDI-2 subscales showed high correlations with the SCOFF scores proving initial evidence of criterion validity. A score of two points on the SCOFF optimized the sensitivity (78 %) and specificity (84 %). With this cutoff, the SCOFF correctly classified over half the cases (PPV = 58 %) and screened out the majority of non-cases (NPV = 93 %) providing further evidence of criterion validity. Analyses were repeated separately for men and women, yielding gender-specific information on the SCOFF's performance.

conclusionsTaken as a whole, results indicated that the SCOFF can be a useful tool for identifying Mexican university students who are at risk of eating disorders.

Indexed as

StudentsUniversitiesAdolescentAdultFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMexicoMiddle AgedSelf ReportSensitivity and SpecificitySex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEating disorder examinationEating disorder inventoryEating disordersMexicoSCOFFValidation

Identifiers

PMID26928282
OpenAlexW2289458997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.