Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26928173›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2016

Using routine data to improve palliative and end of life care.

Joanna M Davies, Wei Gao, Katherine E Sleeman, Katie Lindsey, Fliss E Murtagh, Joan M Teno, Luc Deliens, Bee Wee, Irene J Higginson, Julia Verne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Equitable inclusion of patients with cancer on the palliative care register: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna M DaviesKings College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
Wei GaoKings College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
Katherine E SleemanKings College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
Katie LindseyNational End of Life Care Intelligence Network, Public Health England, London, UK.
Fliss E MurtaghKings College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
Joan M TenoDivision of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cambia Palliative Care Centre of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Luc DeliensEnd of Life Care Research Group, University of Brussels and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Bee WeeDepartment of Palliative Care, Experimental Medicine Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Irene J HigginsonKings College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
Julia VerneKnowledge & Intelligence Team (South West), Public Health England, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 09/2000/58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative and end of life care is essential to healthcare systems worldwide, yet a minute proportion of research funding is spent on palliative and end of life care research. Routinely collected health and social care data provide an efficient and useful opportunity for evaluating and improving care for patients and families. There are excellent examples of routine data research in palliative and end of life care, but routine data resources are widely underutilised. We held four workshops on using routinely collected health and social care data in palliative and end of life care. Researchers presented studies from the UK, USA and Europe. The aim was to highlight valuable examples of work with routine data including work with death registries, hospital activity records, primary care data and specialist palliative care registers. This article disseminates that work, describes the benefits of routine data research and identifies major challenges for the future use of routine data, including; access to data, improving data linkage, and the need for more palliative and end of life care specific data.

Indexed as

Data CollectionPalliative CareTerminal CareHumansInformation DisseminationQuality of Health CareAdministrative dataDeath registrationHospital episode statisticsIndividual level health dataPalliative and end of life careRoutine data

Identifiers

PMID26928173
PMCPMC5013160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.