Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26927831›Full record

Trial reportHealth services research2016

Understanding Consumer Perceptions and Awareness of Hospital-Based Maternity Care Quality Measures.

Maureen Maurer, Kirsten Firminger, Pam Dardess, Kourtney Ikeler, Shoshanna Sofaer, Kristin L Carman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient Perspectives in Comparing Hospitals for Childbirth: Insights from Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2019
    Article
  8. Severe maternal morbidity and related hospital quality measures in Maryland.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maureen MaurerAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kirsten FirmingerAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC.
Pam DardessAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kourtney IkelerAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC.
Shoshanna SofaerAmerican Institutes for Research, New York, NY.
Kristin L CarmanAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC.

Funding

Assessing the effects of an intervention to increase relevancy and use of publicR21HS021873 · AHRQ · AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH · PI CARMAN, KRISTIN L · 2012 to 2014
$900k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS021873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore factors that may influence use of comparative public reports for hospital maternity care. DATA SOURCES: Four focus groups conducted in 2013 with 41 women and preintervention survey data collected in 2014 to 2015 from 245 pregnant women in North Carolina. STUDY

designAs part of a larger randomized controlled trial, we conducted qualitative formative research to develop an intervention that will be evaluated through pre- and postintervention surveys. DATA EXTRACTION

methodsAnalysis of focus group transcripts examined participants' perceptions of high-quality maternity care and the importance of different quality measures. Quantitative analysis included descriptive results of the preintervention survey and subgroup analyses to examine the impact of race, education, and being a first-time mom on outcomes. PRINCIPAL

findingsWhen describing high-quality maternity care, participants focused on interactions with providers, including respect for preferences and communication. The importance of quality measures was influenced by the extent to which they focused on babies' health, were perceived as the hospital's responsibility, and were perceived as representing "standard care." At baseline, 28 percent of survey respondents had used quality information to choose a hospital. Survey respondents were more aware of some quality measures (e.g., breastfeeding support) than others (e.g., episiotomy rates).

conclusionsPublic reporting efforts could help increase relevance of maternity care quality measures by creating measures that reflect women's concerns, clearly explaining the hospital's role in supporting quality care, and showing how available quality measures can inform decisions about childbirth.

Indexed as

AwarenessPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaternal Health ServicesNorth CarolinaPregnancyQualitative ResearchQuality Indicators, Health CareResearch ReportSurveys and Questionnairesmaternity carepatient engagementPublic reportingqualitative researchquality measurement

Identifiers

PMID26927831
PMCPMC4874945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.