ArticlePsychological research2016
Exploring the numerical mind by eye-tracking: a special issue.
Article in Psychological research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnitude processing in young and older adults: Congruency between quantity and brightness.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- The Effect of Writing Direction and Task-Specific Experience on Mapping Time and Numbers on Space.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Looking into the Calculating Mind: Evidence About Arithmetic from Eye-Tracking Studies.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Understanding consumer perception and acceptance of AI art through eye tracking and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers-based sentiment analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2024Article
- Reading/writing direction as a source of directional bias in spatial cognition: Possible mechanisms and scope.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Does the implicit models of leadership influence the scanning of other-race faces in adults?PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
26927470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.