Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26927446›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2016

Capecitabine and bevacizumab with or without vinorelbine in first-line treatment of HER2/neu-negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer: final efficacy and safety data of the randomised, open-label superiority phase 3 CARIN trial.

A Welt, N Marschner, C Lerchenmueller, T Decker, C-C Steffens, A Koehler, R Depenbusch, S Busies, S Hegewisch-Becker

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A WeltDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
N MarschnerOutpatient-Centre for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Haematology, Wirthstrasse 11c, 79110, Freiburg I.Br., Germany. marschner@onkologie-freiburg.de.
C LerchenmuellerOncology Outpatient-Centre, Muenster, Germany.
T DeckerOncology Outpatient-Centre, Ravensburg, Germany.
C-C SteffensOncology Outpatient-Centre, Stade, Germany.
A KoehlerOncology Outpatient-Centre, Langen, Germany.
R DepenbuschOncology Outpatient-Centre, Guetersloh, Germany.
S BusiesIOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
S Hegewisch-BeckerHOPE-Practice for Oncology, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was designed to evaluate efficacy and superiority of capecitabine/bevacizumab + vinorelbine (CAP/BEV/VIN) compared to CAP/BEV alone. Main purpose was to introduce a taxane-/anthracycline-free first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer (ABC), in order to avoid long-term toxicities. In this open-label, superiority, phase 3 trial, patients with HER2-negative ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral CAP at 1000 mg/m(2) [twice daily, days 1-14, q3w] plus intravenous BEV at 15 mg/kg [day 1, q3w] (arm A) or in addition to this protocol intravenous VIN at 25 mg/m(2) [days 1 + 8, q3w] (arm B) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Between 26 February 2009 and 26 October 2012, we randomised 600 patients (arm A N = 300; arm B N = 300) from 57 German outpatient-centres and 2 university hospitals. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (primary endpoint) was not improved with VIN (CAP/BEV, 8.8 months; CAP/BEV/VIN, 9.6 months; HR 0.84 [95 % CI 0.70-1.01], P = 0.058). Median overall survival (OS) (secondary endpoint) was 25.1 and 27.2 months for CAP/BEV and CAP/BEV/VIN, respectively, average HR 0.85 [95 % CI 0.70-1.03], P = 0.104). The 1- and 2-year OS rates appeared to be similar (78.0 and 77.0 %; 53.0 and 54.0 %). Toxicity profiles were generally mild and manageable. Adverse events occurred more frequently in arm B. Regarding the balance between clinical efficacy (PFS, OS) and toxicity, the CAP/BEV combination provides a favourable treatment option in first-line ABC avoiding taxane- and/or anthracycline-induced long-term toxicity. Superiority of CAP/BEV/VIN was not met, and side effects were even enhanced. Nevertheless, no safety issues occurred.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVinblastineVinorelbineBevacizumabCapecitabineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesVinblastineVinorelbineAdvanced breast cancerBevacizumabCapecitabineFirst lineTaxane-free regimenVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID26927446
PMCPMC4788680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.