ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016
Diagnosis of Bacterial Bloodstream Infections: A 16S Metagenomics Approach.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Investigating the infant gut microbiota in developing countries: worldwide metagenomic meta-analysis involving infants living in sub-urban areas of Côte d'Ivoire.Environmental microbiology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Expanding the use of circulating microbiome in fish: contrast between the gut and blood microbiome ofISME communications · 2025Article
- Investigating the etiologies of non-malarial febrile illness in Senegal using metagenomic sequencing.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Metagenomic Sequencing of Positive Blood Culture Fluid for Accurate Bacterial and Fungal Species Identification: A Pilot Study.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Combining Acoustic Bioprinting with AI-Assisted Raman Spectroscopy for High-Throughput Identification of Bacteria in Blood.Nano letters · 2023Article
- Pylephlebitis: A Systematic Review on Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Portal Vein Thrombosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Identification of bacterial pathogens in sudden unexpected death in infancy and childhood using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Next Generation and Other Sequencing Technologies in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.Genes · 2022Review
- Molecular Methodologies for Improved Polymicrobial Sepsis Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Differential Effect of Light and Dark Period Sleep Fragmentation on Composition of Gut Microbiome and Inflammation in Mice.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiomic Approach to Analyze Infant Gut Microbiota: Experimental and Analytical Method Optimization.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Tracking bacterial DNA patterns in septic progression using 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2021Article
- Article
- Childhood diarrhoeal diseases in developing countries.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Article
- TARGETING THE 16S RRNA GENE FOR BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION IN COMPLEX MIXED SAMPLES: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SECOND (ILLUMINA) AND THIRD (OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES) GENERATION SEQUENCING TECHNOLOGIES.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Assessment of a metabarcoding approach for the characterisation of vector-borne bacteria in canines from Bangkok, Thailand.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of Infant Stool Bacteria Communities Before and After Acute Febrile Malaria and Artemether-Lumefantrine Treatment.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial bloodstream infection (bBSI) is one of the leading causes of death in critically ill patients and accurate diagnosis is therefore crucial. We here report a 16S metagenomics approach for diagnosing and understanding bBSI. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe proof-of-concept was delivered in 75 children (median age 15 months) with severe febrile illness in Burkina Faso. Standard blood culture and malaria testing were conducted at the time of hospital admission. 16S metagenomics testing was done retrospectively and in duplicate on the blood of all patients. Total DNA was extracted from the blood and the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR and deep sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Paired reads were curated, taxonomically labeled, and filtered. Blood culture diagnosed bBSI in 12 patients, but this number increased to 22 patients when combining blood culture and 16S metagenomics results. In addition to superior sensitivity compared to standard blood culture, 16S metagenomics revealed important novel insights into the nature of bBSI. Patients with acute malaria or recovering from malaria had a 7-fold higher risk of presenting polymicrobial bloodstream infections compared to patients with no recent malaria diagnosis (p-value = 0.046). Malaria is known to affect epithelial gut function and may thus facilitate bacterial translocation from the intestinal lumen to the blood. Importantly, patients with such polymicrobial blood infections showed a 9-fold higher risk factor for not surviving their febrile illness (p-value = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data demonstrate that 16S metagenomics is a powerful approach for the diagnosis and understanding of bBSI. This proof-of-concept study also showed that appropriate control samples are crucial to detect background signals due to environmental contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.