Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26927306›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Diagnosis of Bacterial Bloodstream Infections: A 16S Metagenomics Approach.

Saskia Decuypere, Conor J Meehan, Sandra Van Puyvelde, Tessa De Block, Jessica Maltha, Lompo Palpouguini, Marc Tahita, Halidou Tinto, Jan Jacobs, Stijn Deborggraeve

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Methodologies for Improved Polymicrobial Sepsis Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saskia DecuypereTelethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Conor J MeehanBiomedical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Sandra Van PuyveldeBiomedical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Tessa De BlockBiomedical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Jessica MalthaClinical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Lompo PalpouguiniClinical Research Unit of Nanoro (CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Marc TahitaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro (CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Halidou TintoClinical Research Unit of Nanoro (CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Jan JacobsClinical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Stijn DeborggraeveBiomedical Sciences Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial bloodstream infection (bBSI) is one of the leading causes of death in critically ill patients and accurate diagnosis is therefore crucial. We here report a 16S metagenomics approach for diagnosing and understanding bBSI. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe proof-of-concept was delivered in 75 children (median age 15 months) with severe febrile illness in Burkina Faso. Standard blood culture and malaria testing were conducted at the time of hospital admission. 16S metagenomics testing was done retrospectively and in duplicate on the blood of all patients. Total DNA was extracted from the blood and the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR and deep sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Paired reads were curated, taxonomically labeled, and filtered. Blood culture diagnosed bBSI in 12 patients, but this number increased to 22 patients when combining blood culture and 16S metagenomics results. In addition to superior sensitivity compared to standard blood culture, 16S metagenomics revealed important novel insights into the nature of bBSI. Patients with acute malaria or recovering from malaria had a 7-fold higher risk of presenting polymicrobial bloodstream infections compared to patients with no recent malaria diagnosis (p-value = 0.046). Malaria is known to affect epithelial gut function and may thus facilitate bacterial translocation from the intestinal lumen to the blood. Importantly, patients with such polymicrobial blood infections showed a 9-fold higher risk factor for not surviving their febrile illness (p-value = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data demonstrate that 16S metagenomics is a powerful approach for the diagnosis and understanding of bBSI. This proof-of-concept study also showed that appropriate control samples are crucial to detect background signals due to environmental contamination.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBacteriaBacterial InfectionsChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansInfantMaleMetagenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26927306
PMCPMC4771206
OpenAlexW2289372588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.