Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26927293›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2016

Evaluation of the effects of specific opioid receptor agonists in a rodent model of spinal cord injury.

M Aceves, B B Mathai, M A Hook

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AcevesDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA.
B B MathaiDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA.
M A HookDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA.
Texas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

Morphine undermines recovery of function after SCI: Neurobiological mechanismsR01DA031197 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI HOOK, MICHELLE A · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study aimed to evaluate the contribution(s) of specific opioid receptor systems to the analgesic and detrimental effects of morphine, observed after spinal cord injury in prior studies. STUDY

designWe used specific opioid receptor agonists to assess the effects of μ- (DAMGO), δ- (DPDPE) and κ- (GR89696) opioid receptor activation on locomotor (Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale, tapered beam and ladder tests) and sensory (girdle, tactile and tail-flick tests) recovery in a rodent contusion model (T12). We also tested the contribution of non-classic opioid binding using [+]- morphine.

methodsFirst, a dose-response curve for analgesic efficacy was generated for each opioid agonist. Baseline locomotor and sensory reactivity was assessed 24 h after injury. Subjects were then treated with an intrathecal dose of a specific agonist and re-tested after 30 min. To evaluate the effects on recovery, subjects were treated with a single dose of an agonist and both locomotor and sensory function were monitored for 21 days.

resultsAll agonists for the classic opioid receptors, but not the [+]- morphine enantiomer, produced antinociception at a concentration equivalent to a dose of morphine previously shown to produce strong analgesic effects (0.32 μmol). DAMGO and [+]- morphine did not affect long-term recovery. GR89696, however, significantly undermined the recovery of locomotor function at all doses tested.

conclusionsOn the basis of these data, we hypothesize that the analgesic efficacy of morphine is primarily mediated by binding to the classic μ-opioid receptor. Conversely, the adverse effects of morphine may be linked to activation of the κ-opioid receptor. Ultimately, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of morphine is imperative to develop safe and effective pharmacological interventions in a clinical setting.

settingUSA. SPONSORSHIP: Grant DA31197 to MA Hook and the NIDA Drug Supply Program.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-LocomotionMaleMorphinePain MeasurementPiperazinesPyrrolidinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnalgesics, OpioidEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-GR 89696MorphinePiperazinesPyrrolidines

Identifiers

PMID26927293
PMCPMC5009008
OpenAlexW2289406061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.