ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016
Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in DNA Damage Response.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the structure-function paradigm: A comprehensive review of intrinsically disordered proteins.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Protective effects of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles on radiation-induced epididymal cells damage via USP44/RBM14 axis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- RBM14 enhances transcriptional activity of p23 regulating CXCL1 expression to induce lung cancer metastasis.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
- Mechanism of non-coding RNA regulation of DNMT3A.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
- RNA binding proteins (RBPs) on genetic stability and diseases.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Regulation of DNA damage response by RNA/DNA-binding proteins: Implications for neurological disorders and aging.Ageing research reviews · 2024Review
- Interaction between lncRNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) influences DNA damage response in cancer chemoresistance.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- "Boundary residues" between the folded RNA recognition motif and disordered RGG domains are critical for FUS-RNA binding.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
- Identifying the personalized driver gene sets maximally contributing to abnormality of transcriptome phenotype in glioblastoma multiforme individuals.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- METTL3 promotes m6A hypermethylation of RBM14 via YTHDF1 leading to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.Human cell · 2022Article
- Ku70 affects the frequency of chromosome translocation in human lymphocytes after radiation and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- A genomic mutation spectrum of collecting duct carcinoma in the Chinese population.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- Quantitative Analysis of the Protein Methylome Reveals PARP1 Methylation is involved in DNA Damage Response.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Unusual RNA binding of FUS RRM studied by molecular dynamics simulation and enhanced sampling method.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- New Faces of old Friends: Emerging new Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in the DNA Double-Strand Break Response.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Connections between 3' end processing and DNA damage response: Ten years later.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2020Review
- Alternative Splicing and DNA Damage Response in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living cells experience DNA damage as a result of replication errors and oxidative metabolism, exposure to environmental agents (e.g., ultraviolet light, ionizing radiation (IR)), and radiation therapies and chemotherapies for cancer treatments. Accumulation of DNA damage can lead to multiple diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, immune deficiencies, infertility, and also aging. Cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms to deal with DNA damage. Networks of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are coordinated to detect and repair DNA damage, regulate cell cycle and transcription, and determine the cell fate. Upstream factors of DNA damage checkpoints and repair, "sensor" proteins, detect DNA damage and send the signals to downstream factors in order to maintain genomic integrity. Unexpectedly, we have discovered that an RNA-processing factor is involved in DNA repair processes. We have identified a gene that contributes to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)'s treatment resistance and recurrence. This gene, RBM14, is known to function in transcription and RNA splicing. RBM14 is also required for maintaining the stem-like state of GBM spheres, and it controls the DNA-PK-dependent non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway by interacting with KU80. RBM14 is a RNA-binding protein (RBP) with low complexity domains, called intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and it also physically interacts with PARP1. Furthermore, RBM14 is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR)-dependent manner (unpublished data). DNA-dependent PARP1 (poly-(ADP) ribose polymerase 1) makes key contributions in the DNA damage response (DDR) network. RBM14 therefore plays an important role in a PARP-dependent DSB repair process. Most recently, it was shown that the other RBPs with intrinsically disordered domains are recruited to DNA damage sites in a PAR-dependent manner, and that these RBPs form liquid compartments (also known as "liquid-demixing"). Among the PAR-associated IDPs are FUS/TLS (fused in sarcoma/translocated in sarcoma), EWS (Ewing sarcoma), TARF15 (TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 68 kDa) (also called FET proteins), a number of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), and RBM14. Importantly, various point mutations within the FET genes have been implicated in pathological protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases, specifically with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and frontotemporal lobe degeneration (FTLD). The FET proteins also frequently exhibit gene translocation in human cancers, and emerging evidence shows their physical interactions with DDR proteins and thus implies their involvement in the maintenance of genome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.