Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26927075›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

How to Study Biofilms after Microbial Colonization of Materials Used in Orthopaedic Implants.

Lorenzo Drago, Serse Agrappi, Monica Bortolin, Marco Toscano, Carlo Luca Romanò, Elena De Vecchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Combination of the Natural Molecules Gallic Acid and Carvacrol EradicatesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial biofilm formation is variably inhibited by different formulations of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in vitro.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenzo DragoLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy. lorenzo.drago@unimi.it.
Serse AgrappiLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy. serse.agrappi@gmail.com.
Monica BortolinLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy. monica.bortolin85@gmail.com.
Marco ToscanoLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, via L. Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy. toscano.marco1@gmail.com.
Carlo Luca RomanòDepartment of Bone and Joint Infections and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy. carlo.romano@grupposandonato.it.
Elena De VecchiLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy. devecchi.elena@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, various techniques have been proposed for the quantitative evaluation of microbial biofilms. Spectrophotometry after crystal violet staining is a widespread method for biofilm evaluation, but several data indicate that it does not guarantee a good specificity, although it is rather easy to use and cost saving. Confocal laser microscopy is one of the most sensitive and specific tools to study biofilms, and it is largely used for research. However, in some cases, no quantitative measurement of the matrix thickness or of the amount of embedded microorganisms has been performed, due to limitation in availability of dedicated software. For this reason, we have developed a protocol to evaluate the microbial biofilm formed on sandblasted titanium used for orthopaedic implants, that allows measurement of biomass volume and the amount of included cells. Results indicate good reproducibility in terms of measurement of biomass and microbial cells. Moreover, this protocol has proved to be applicable for evaluation of the efficacy of different anti-biofilm treatments used in the orthopaedic setting. Summing up, the protocol here described is a valid and inexpensive method for the study of microbial biofilm on prosthetic implant materials.

Indexed as

BiomassBiofilmsCandidaJoint ProsthesisMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicroscopy, ConfocalPseudomonas aeruginosaTitaniumTitaniumbiofilmconfocal laser scanning microscopyfluorescent stainsimages analysisprosthetic implants

Identifiers

PMID26927075
PMCPMC4813157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.