Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26926942›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2016

Implementation and Operational Research: Evaluation of a Public-Sector, Provider-Initiated Cryptococcal Antigen Screening and Treatment Program, Western Cape, South Africa.

Snigdha Vallabhaneni, Nicky Longley, Mariette Smith, Rachel Smith, Meg Osler, Nicola Kelly, Anna Cross, Andrew Boulle, Graeme Meintjes, Nelesh P Govender

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CD4 Cell Count Threshold for Cryptococcal Antigen Screening of HIV-Infected Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishing targets for advanced HIV disease: A call to action.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cryptococcal Antigenemia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antiretroviral Therapy-Experienced Ugandans With Virologic Failure.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. The Continuing Burden of Advanced HIV Disease Over 10 Years of Increasing Antiretroviral Therapy Coverage in South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Snigdha Vallabhaneni *Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nicky Longley *St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
Mariette SmithCentre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rachel SmithMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Meg OslerCentre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nicola KellyDesmond Tutu HIV/AIDS Foundation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Anna CrossDesmond Tutu HIV/AIDS Foundation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andrew BoulleCentre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Graeme MeintjesInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town.
Nelesh P GovenderNational Institute for Communicable Diseases - Centre for Opportunistic, Tropical and Hospital Infections, a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZANational Research Foundation · ZACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Phased Implementation of a Public Health Programme: Cryptococcal Screening and Treatment in South AfricaR01AI118511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BOULWARE, DAVID R, GOVENDER, NELESH PREMAPRAGASAN · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118511Wellcome Trust 098316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) may identify those at risk for disseminated cryptococcal disease (DCD), and preemptive fluconazole treatment may prevent progression to DCD. In August 2012, the Western Cape Province (WC), South Africa, adopted provider-initiated CrAg screening. We evaluated the implementation and effectiveness of this large-scale public-sector program during its first year, September 1, 2012-August 31, 2013.

methodsWe used data from the South African National Health Laboratory Service, WC provincial HIV program, and nationwide surveillance data for DCD. We assessed the proportion of eligible patients screened for CrAg (CrAg test done within 30 days of CD4 date) and the prevalence of CrAg positivity. Incidence of DCD among those screened was compared with those not screened.

resultsOf 4395 eligible patients, 26.6% (n = 1170) were screened. The proportion of patients screened increased from 15.9% in September 2012 to 36.6% in August 2013. The prevalence of positive serum CrAg was 2.1%. Treatment data were available for 13 of 24 CrAg-positive patients; 9 of 13 were treated with fluconazole. Nine (0.8%) incident cases of DCD occurred among the 1170 patients who were screened for CrAg vs. 49 (1.5%) incident cases among the 3225 patients not screened (P = 0.07).

conclusionsRelatively few eligible patients were screened under the WC provider-initiated CrAg screening program. Unscreened patients were nearly twice as likely to develop DCD. CrAg screening can reduce the burden of DCD, but needs to be implemented well. To improve screening rates, countries should consider laboratory-based reflexive screening when possible.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningOperations ResearchAdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsAntigens, FungalAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMeningitis, CryptococcalPatient Outcome AssessmentRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaAntifungal AgentsAntigens, FungalAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID26926942
PMCPMC4871265
OpenAlexW2322566180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.