Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26926526›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2016

Evolution of plant genome architecture.

Jonathan F Wendel, Scott A Jackson, Blake C Meyers, Rod A Wing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 218 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TwoPlant diversity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct evolutionary trajectories of gene duplication modes in 40 diploid cotton genomes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. jfw@iastate.edu.
Scott A JacksonCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Blake C MeyersDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Rod A WingArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tucson, AZ, 85750, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have witnessed an explosion in our understanding of the evolution and structure of plant genomes in recent years. Here, we highlight three important emergent realizations: (1) that the evolutionary history of all plant genomes contains multiple, cyclical episodes of whole-genome doubling that were followed by myriad fractionation processes; (2) that the vast majority of the variation in genome size reflects the dynamics of proliferation and loss of lineage-specific transposable elements; and (3) that various classes of small RNAs help shape genomic architecture and function. We illustrate ways in which understanding these organism-level and molecular genetic processes can be used for crop plant improvement.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPolyploidyArabidopsisDNA Transposable ElementsGenome SizePhylogenyDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID26926526
PMCPMC4772531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.