Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26926275›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Environmental and genetic determinants of innovativeness in a natural population of birds.

John L Quinn, Ella F Cole, Thomas E Reed, Julie Morand-Ferron

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Problem Solving in Animals: Proposal for an Ontogenetic Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Innovation: an emerging focus from cells to societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  20. Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

John L QuinnSchool of BEES, University College Cork, North Mall, Cork, T23 N73K, Republic of Ireland Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK j.quinn@ucc.ie.
Ella F ColeEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
Thomas E ReedSchool of BEES, University College Cork, North Mall, Cork, T23 N73K, Republic of Ireland.
Julie Morand-FerronDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5186-7710
University College Cork · IEUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D526702/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the evidence for the idea that individuals differ in their propensity to innovate and solve new problems has come from studies on captive primates. Increasingly, behavioural ecologists are studying innovativeness in wild populations, and uncovering links with functional behaviour and fitness-related traits. The relative importance of genetic and environmental factors in driving this variation, however, remains unknown. Here, we present the results of the first large-scale study to examine a range of causal factors underlying innovative problem-solving performance (PSP) among 831 great tits (Parus major) temporarily taken into captivity. Analyses show that PSP in this population: (i) was linked to a variety of individual factors, including age, personality and natal origin (immigrant or local-born); (ii) was influenced by natal environment, because individuals had a lower PSP when born in poor-quality habitat, or where local population density was high, leading to cohort effects. Links with many of the individual and environmental factors were present only in some years. In addition, PSP (iii) had little or no measurable heritability, as estimated by a Bayesian animal model; and (iv) was not influenced by maternal effects. Despite previous reports of links between PSP and a range of functional traits in this population, the analyses here suggest that innovativeness had weak if any evolutionary potential. Instead most individual variation was caused by phenotypic plasticity driven by links with other behavioural traits and by environmentally mediated developmental stress. Heritability estimates are population, time and context specific, however, and more studies are needed to determine the generality of these effects. Our results shed light on the causes of innovativeness within populations, and add to the debate on the relative importance of genetic and environmental factors in driving phenotypic variation within populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalEnvironmentExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalPasseriformesProblem SolvingSeasonsTime Factorsdevelopmental stress hypothesisheritabilityinnovationnecessity hypothesispersonalityproblem solving

Identifiers

PMID26926275
PMCPMC4780527
OpenAlexW2291349742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.