Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26926066›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical focus2016

Optical technologies for intraoperative neurosurgical guidance.

Pablo A Valdés, David W Roberts, Fa-Ke Lu, Alexandra Golby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Image-Guided Brain Tumor Surgery.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Towards Optical Biopsy in Glioma Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo A ValdésDepartments of 1 Neurosurgery and.
David W RobertsSection of Neurosurgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Fa-Ke Lu
Alexandra GolbyDepartments of 1 Neurosurgery and.

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Stimulated Raman imaging for label-free histology to guide brain tumor surgeryK99EB020749 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LU, FAKE · 2015 to 2016
$189k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB020749NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical optics is a broadly interdisciplinary field at the interface of optical engineering, biophysics, computer science, medicine, biology, and chemistry, helping us understand light-tissue interactions to create applications with diagnostic and therapeutic value in medicine. Implementation of biomedical optics tools and principles has had a notable scientific and clinical resurgence in recent years in the neurosurgical community. This is in great part due to work in fluorescence-guided surgery of brain tumors leading to reports of significant improvement in maximizing the rates of gross-total resection. Multiple additional optical technologies have been implemented clinically, including diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and imaging, optical coherence tomography, Raman spectroscopy and imaging, and advanced quantitative methods, including quantitative fluorescence and lifetime imaging. Here we present a clinically relevant and technologically informed overview and discussion of some of the major clinical implementations of optical technologies as intraoperative guidance tools in neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresSpectrum Analysis, RamanTomography, Optical CoherenceALA-PpIX = 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IXBBB = blood-brain barrierbiomedical opticsCARS = coherent anti-Stokes Raman scatteringCBF = cerebral blood flowCCD = charge-coupled devicediffuse reflectance spectroscopy and imagingfluorescence-guided surgeryfluorescence lifetimeGBM = glioblastoma multiformeGTR = gross-total resectionICG = indocyanine greenimage-guided surgerylaser speckle contrast imagingLSCI = laser speckle contrast imagingNIR = near-infraredOCT = optical coherence tomographyoptical coherence tomographyRaman spectroscopy and imagingSRS = stimulated Raman scatteringλem = emission wavelengthλex = excitation wavelength

Identifiers

PMID26926066
PMCPMC4860344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.