Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925971›Full record

ArticleFly2015

Blood cell progenitor maintenance: Collier barks out of the niche.

Billel Benmimoun, Marc Haenlin, Lucas Waltzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fly, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Billel Benmimouna Université de Toulouse; UPS; CBD (Center de Biologie du Développement) France CNRS, CBD UMR5547 , F-31062 Toulouse , France.
Marc Haenlina Université de Toulouse; UPS; CBD (Center de Biologie du Développement) France CNRS, CBD UMR5547 , F-31062 Toulouse , France.
Lucas Waltzera Université de Toulouse; UPS; CBD (Center de Biologie du Développement) France CNRS, CBD UMR5547 , F-31062 Toulouse , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila lymph gland, a larval haematopoietic organ, has emerged as a popular model to study regulatory mechanisms controlling blood cell progenitor fate. In this organ, the Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), a small group of cells expressing the EBF transcription factor Collier, has been proposed to act as a niche required for progenitor maintenance. Accordingly, several reports showed that PSC size/activity modulation impacts on blood cell differentiation. Yet our recent results challenge this model. Indeed, we found that PSC ablation does not affect haematopoietic progenitor maintenance. This unexpected result led us to reinvestigate the role of the PSC and collier in hematopoiesis. Consistent with previous findings, the PSC appears required for the production of a specialized blood cell type in response to parasitization. Moreover, our results indicate that the massive blood cell differentiation observed in collier mutant larvae is not due to the lack of PSC but to collier expression within the haematopoietic progenitors. We thus propose a paradigm shift whereby larval blood cell progenitor maintenance is largely independent of the PSC but requires the cell-autonomous function of collier.

Indexed as

HematopoiesisAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsLarvaSignal TransductionStem Cell NicheTranscription FactorsDrosophila Proteinskn protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsCollier/EBFDrosophilahematopoiesislymph glandstem cell niche

Identifiers

PMID26925971
PMCPMC4862434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.