Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925551›Full record

ArticleRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2016

VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

Arthika Chandramohan, Sandra S Stinnett, John T Petrowski, Stefanie G Schuman, Cynthia A Toth, Scott W Cousins, Eleonora M Lad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02873351 (Pilot Study of L-DOPA Safety and Tolerability in Patients With AMD, and Proof of Concept That L-DOPA Improves Surrogate Biomarkers in Patients With Moderate to Advanced AMD), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02873351 phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of L-DOPA Safety and Tolerability in Patients With AMD, and Proof of Concept That L-DOPA Improves Surrogate Biomarkers in Patients With Moderate to Advanced AMD

TypeinterventionalSponsorSnyder, Robert W., M.D., Ph.D., P.C.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsAge-related Macular DegenerationArmscarbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg, placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Spectrum of Functional, Structural, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arthika ChandramohanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sandra S Stinnett
John T Petrowski
Stefanie G Schuman
Cynthia A Toth
Scott W Cousins
Eleonora M Lad
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

NEI Mentored Clincial Scientist Development Program Award (K12)K12EY016333 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COUSINS, SCOTT W · 2004 to 2013
$5.4M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY016333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objectives of this study were to evaluate 1) the feasibility of performing computerized tests of low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), cone-specific contrast (Cone Contrast Test [CCT]), contrast sensitivity, and microperimetry and 2) the test-retest repeatability of these outcomes in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methodsThis prospective study enrolled 30 subjects at a single site (8 controls, 8 early AMD, and 12 intermediate AMD). Subjects underwent LLVA, contrast sensitivity, CCT, and microperimetry with eye tracking. Low luminance deficit was defined as best-corrected visual acuity minus LLVA in EDTRS letters. Follow-up testing was administered at approximately 1 month.

resultsThere was high test-retest repeatability at one month for all visual function metrics (intraclass correlations >0.7) except log contrast sensitivity (intraclass correlations 0.6). Compared with controls, patients with intermediate AMD showed significant deficits on best-corrected visual acuity, LLVA, low luminance deficit, percent-reduced threshold on microperimetry, and red CCT (P < 0.05), but not on contrast sensitivity, green and blue CCT.

conclusionThis pilot study supports the feasibility and reliability of using LLVA, microperimetry, and CCT in early dry AMD. Our data suggest these measures can be used as alternative future clinical trial endpoints. A larger, prospective natural history study of alternative visual function measures in dry AMD is warranted.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationReproducibility of ResultsHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID26925551
PMCPMC4844847
OpenAlexW2291910723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.