Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925338›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Spider phylogenomics: untangling the Spider Tree of Life.

Nicole L Garrison, Juanita Rodriguez, Ingi Agnarsson, Jonathan A Coddington, Charles E Griswold, Christopher A Hamilton, Marshal Hedin, Kevin M Kocot, Joel M Ledford, Jason E Bond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paralysis efficiency (PDToxicon: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Two newZooKeys · 2026
    Article
  3. Genome size estimation and evolution trends in Acari.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L GarrisonDepartment of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University , Auburn, AL , United States.
Juanita RodriguezDepartment of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University , Auburn, AL , United States.
Ingi AgnarssonDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont , Burlington, VT , United States.
Jonathan A CoddingtonDepartment of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution , Washingtion, DC , United States.
Charles E GriswoldArachnology, California Academy of Sciences , San Francisco, CA , United States.
Christopher A HamiltonDepartment of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University , Auburn, AL , United States.
Marshal HedinDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Kevin M KocotDepartment of Biological Sciences and Alabama Museum of Natural History, University of Alabama-Tuscaloosa , Tuscaloosa, AL , United States.
Joel M LedfordDepartment of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis , Davis, CA , United States.
Jason E BondDepartment of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University , Auburn, AL , United States.
Auburn University · USAmerican Museum of Natural History · USCalifornia Academy of Sciences · USSan Diego State University · USSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiders (Order Araneae) are massively abundant generalist arthropod predators that are found in nearly every ecosystem on the planet and have persisted for over 380 million years. Spiders have long served as evolutionary models for studying complex mating and web spinning behaviors, key innovation and adaptive radiation hypotheses, and have been inspiration for important theories like sexual selection by female choice. Unfortunately, past major attempts to reconstruct spider phylogeny typically employing the "usual suspect" genes have been unable to produce a well-supported phylogenetic framework for the entire order. To further resolve spider evolutionary relationships we have assembled a transcriptome-based data set comprising 70 ingroup spider taxa. Using maximum likelihood and shortcut coalescence-based approaches, we analyze eight data sets, the largest of which contains 3,398 gene regions and 696,652 amino acid sites forming the largest phylogenomic analysis of spider relationships produced to date. Contrary to long held beliefs that the orb web is the crowning achievement of spider evolution, ancestral state reconstructions of web type support a phylogenetically ancient origin of the orb web, and diversification analyses show that the mostly ground-dwelling, web-less RTA clade diversified faster than orb weavers. Consistent with molecular dating estimates we report herein, this may reflect a major increase in biomass of non-flying insects during the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution 125-90 million years ago favoring diversification of spiders that feed on cursorial rather than flying prey. Our results also have major implications for our understanding of spider systematics. Phylogenomic analyses corroborate several well-accepted high level groupings: Opisthothele, Mygalomorphae, Atypoidina, Avicularoidea, Theraphosoidina, Araneomorphae, Entelegynae, Araneoidea, the RTA clade, Dionycha and the Lycosoidea. Alternatively, our results challenge the monophyly of Eresoidea, Orbiculariae, and Deinopoidea. The composition of the major paleocribellate and neocribellate clades, the basal divisions of Araneomorphae, appear to be falsified. Traditional Haplogynae is in need of revision, as our findings appear to support the newly conceived concept of Synspermiata. The sister pairing of filistatids with hypochilids implies that some peculiar features of each family may in fact be synapomorphic for the pair. Leptonetids now are seen as a possible sister group to the Entelegynae, illustrating possible intermediates in the evolution of the more complex entelegyne genitalic condition, spinning organs and respiratory organs.

Indexed as

ArachnidaAraneaeMolecular systematicsSpider phylogenyWeb evolution

Identifiers

PMID26925338
PMCPMC4768681
OpenAlexW2169525808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.