Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925212›Full record

ReviewEvoDevo2016

Developmental changes and novelties in ceratophryid frogs.

Marissa Fabrezi, Silvia Inés Quinzio, Javier Goldberg, Julio César Cruz, Mariana Chuliver Pereyra, Richard J Wassersug

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EvoDevo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pathologic Lesions of the Budgett Frog (Comparative medicine · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marissa FabreziInstituto de Bio y Geociencias (IBIGEO), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET-Salta, 9 de Julio 14, 4405 Rosario de Lerma, Salta Republic of Argentina.
Silvia Inés QuinzioInstituto de Bio y Geociencias (IBIGEO), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET-Salta, 9 de Julio 14, 4405 Rosario de Lerma, Salta Republic of Argentina.
Javier GoldbergInstituto de Bio y Geociencias (IBIGEO), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET-Salta, 9 de Julio 14, 4405 Rosario de Lerma, Salta Republic of Argentina.
Julio César CruzInstituto de Bio y Geociencias (IBIGEO), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET-Salta, 9 de Julio 14, 4405 Rosario de Lerma, Salta Republic of Argentina.
Mariana Chuliver PereyraInstituto de Bio y Geociencias (IBIGEO), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET-Salta, 9 de Julio 14, 4405 Rosario de Lerma, Salta Republic of Argentina.
Richard J WassersugDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARDalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neotropical frog genera Ceratophrys, Chacophrys and Lepidobatrachus form the monophyletic family Ceratophryidae. Although in- and out-group relationships are not fully resolved, the monophyly of the three genera is well supported by both morphological and molecular data. Much is known about the morphology of the ceratophryids, but there is little comparative information on how modification of a common ancestral developmental pathway played a role in shaping their particular body plans. Herein, we review morphological variation during ceratophryid ontogeny in order to explore the role of development in their evolution. The ceratophryids are collectively characterized by rapid larval development with respect to other anurans, yet the three genera differ in their postmetamorphic growth rates to sexual maturity. Derived traits in the group can be divided into many homoplastic features that evolved in parallel with those of anurans with fossorial/burrowing behaviors in semiarid environments, and apomorphies. Morphological novelties have evolved in their feeding mechanism, which makes them capable of feeding on exceptional large prey. Lepidobatrachus is unusual in having reduced the ecomorphological differences between its larvae and adults. As a result, both the larvae and the frog are similarly able to capture large prey underwater. Some unique features in Lepidobatrachus are differentiated in the tadpole and then exaggerated in the adult (e.g., the posterior displaced jaw articulation) in a manner unobserved in any other anurans.

Indexed as

AnuransDevelopmentGrowthMetamorphosisMorphological novelty

Identifiers

PMID26925212
PMCPMC4769514
OpenAlexW2291403127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.