Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925096›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2016

Population Genomics and the Statistical Values of Race: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Biological Classification of Human Populations and Implications for Clinical Genetic Epidemiological Research.

Koffi N Maglo, Tesfaye B Mersha, Lisa J Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interstitial Lung Disease and Sarcoidosis.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Race does matter: venous thromboembolism in trauma patients with isolated severe pelvic fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Removing Race from Kidney Disease Diagnosis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022
    Article
  18. The Need for Shared Nomenclature on Racism and Related Terminology in Psychology.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Article
  19. Racism and mental health and the role of mental health professionals.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
  20. The Case for Health Reparations.Frontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koffi N MagloDepartment of Philosophy, Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tesfaye B MershaDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lisa J MartinDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Admixture mapping in African American Asthmatic ChildrenK01HL103165 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MERSHA, TESFAYE B. · 2010 to 2014
$648k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL103165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological status and biomedical significance of the concept of race as applied to humans continue to be contentious issues despite the use of advanced statistical and clustering methods to determine continental ancestry. It is thus imperative for researchers to understand the limitations as well as potential uses of the concept of race in biology and biomedicine. This paper deals with the theoretical assumptions behind cluster analysis in human population genomics. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, it demonstrates that the hypothesis that attributes the clustering of human populations to "frictional" effects of landform barriers at continental boundaries is empirically incoherent. It then contrasts the scientific status of the "cluster" and "cline" constructs in human population genomics, and shows how cluster may be instrumentally produced. It also shows how statistical values of race vindicate Darwin's argument that race is evolutionarily meaningless. Finally, the paper explains why, due to spatiotemporal parameters, evolutionary forces, and socio-cultural factors influencing population structure, continental ancestry may be pragmatically relevant to global and public health genomics. Overall, this work demonstrates that, from a biological systematic and evolutionary taxonomical perspective, human races/continental groups or clusters have no natural meaning or objective biological reality. In fact, the utility of racial categorizations in research and in clinics can be explained by spatiotemporal parameters, socio-cultural factors, and evolutionary forces affecting disease causation and treatment response.

Indexed as

ancestryclinecluster analysisDarwinian classificationgenomic medicinepair-wise Fstphylogenomicspopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID26925096
PMCPMC4756148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.