Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Q-PCR Based Culture-Independent Enumeration and Detection of Enterobacter: An Emerging Environmental Human Pathogen in Riverine Systems and Potable Water.

Chandra B Patel, Rishi Shanker, Vijai K Gupta, Ram S Upadhyay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Bacterial Removal Efficiency ofEnvironmental health insights · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between duration of intravenous antibiotic administration and early-life microbiota development in late-preterm infants.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chandra B PatelEnvironmental Toxicology Group, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology ResearchLucknow, India; Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasi, India.
Rishi ShankerInstitute of Life Sciences, School of Life Science and Technology, Ahmedabad University Ahmedabad, India.
Vijai K GuptaMolecular Glycobiotechnology Group, Discipline of Biochemistry, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway Galway, Ireland.
Ram S UpadhyayDepartment of Botany, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India.
Ahmedabad University · INBanaras Hindu University · INIndian Institute of Toxicology Research · INOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of safe and pristine water is a global challenge when large numbers of natural and anthropogenic water resources are being depleted with faster rate. The remaining water resources are severely contaminated with various kinds of contaminants including microorganisms. Enterobacter is one of the fecal coliform bacteria of family Enterobacteriaceae. Enterobacter was earlier used as an indicator bacterium along with other fecal Coliforms namely Escherichia coli, Citrobacter, and Klebsiella, but it is now known to cause various diseases in human beings. In this study, we have collected 55 samples from potable water and riverine system and proved their presence using their conserved sequences of 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes with the help of SYBR green real-time PCR, which showed very high specificity for the detection of Enterobacter. The Enterobacter counts in potable water were found to 1290 ± 32.89 to 1460 ± 39.42 cfu/100 ml. The Enterobacter levels in surface water were 1.76 × 10(4) ± 492, 1.33 × 10(4) ± 334, 1.15 × 10(4) ± 308, 2.56 × 10(4) ± 802, 2.89 × 10(4) ± 962, 8.16 × 10(4) ± 3443 cfu/100 ml; the levels of Enterobacter contamination associated with hydrophytes were 4.80 × 10(4) ± 1804, 3.48 × 10(4) ± 856, 8.50 × 10(4) ± 2074, 8.09 × 10(4) ± 1724, 6.30 × 10(4) ± 1738, 3.68 × 10(4) ± 949 cfu/10 g and the Enterobacter counts in sediments of the river, were 2.36 × 10(4) ± 703, 1.98 × 10(4) ± 530, 9.92 × 10(4) ± 3839, 6.80 × 10(4) ± 2230, 8.76 × 10(4) ± 3066 and 2.34 × 10(4) ± 732 cfu/10 g at the sampling Site #1, Site #2, Site #3, Site #4, Site #5, and Site #6, respectively. The assay could be used for the regular monitoring of potable water and other water reservoirs to check waterborne outbreaks.

Indexed as

Enterobacterfecal coliformsmicrobial contaminationquantitative enumerationreal-time PCRriverine system

Identifiers

PMID26925044
PMCPMC4756282
OpenAlexW2282656214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.