Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26925033›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Microbial Community Structure of Activated Sludge in Treatment Plants with Different Wastewater Compositions.

Nataliya M Shchegolkova, George S Krasnov, Anastasia A Belova, Alexey A Dmitriev, Sergey L Kharitonov, Kseniya M Klimina, Nataliya V Melnikova, Anna V Kudryavtseva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Replacing methanol with internally produced VFA-based carbon source for denitrification at the Henriksdal WWTP.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nataliya M ShchegolkovaWater Problems Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia.
George S KrasnovWater Problems Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia.
Anastasia A BelovaWater Problems Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia.
Alexey A DmitrievEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Sergey L KharitonovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Kseniya M KliminaVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Nataliya V MelnikovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Anna V KudryavtsevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activated sludge (AS) plays a crucial role in the treatment of domestic and industrial wastewater. AS is a biocenosis of microorganisms capable of degrading various pollutants, including organic compounds, toxicants, and xenobiotics. We performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing of AS and incoming sewage in three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) responsible for processing sewage with different origins: municipal wastewater, slaughterhouse wastewater, and refinery sewage. In contrast to incoming wastewater, the taxonomic structure of AS biocenosis was found to become stable in time, and each WWTP demonstrated a unique taxonomic pattern. Most pathogenic microorganisms (Streptococcus, Trichococcus, etc.), which are abundantly represented in incoming sewage, were significantly decreased in AS of all WWTPs, except for the slaughterhouse wastewater. Additional load of bioreactors with influent rich in petroleum products and organic matter was associated with the increase of bacteria responsible for AS bulking and foaming. Here, we present a novel approach enabling the prediction of the metabolic potential of bacterial communities based on their taxonomic structures and MetaCyc database data. We developed a software application, XeDetect, to implement this approach. Using XeDetect, we found that the metabolic potential of the three bacterial communities clearly reflected the substrate composition. We revealed that the microorganisms responsible for AS bulking and foaming (most abundant in AS of slaughterhouse wastewater) played a leading role in the degradation of substrates such as fatty acids, amino acids, and other bioorganic compounds. Moreover, we discovered that the chemical, rather than the bacterial composition of the incoming wastewater was the main factor in AS structure formation. XeDetect (freely available: https://sourceforge.net/projects/xedetect) represents a novel powerful tool for the analysis of the metabolic capacity of bacterial communities. The tool will help to optimize bioreactor performance and avoid some most common technical problems.

Indexed as

16S rRNAactivated sludgebacterial communitiesmetabolic pathwaysMetaCyc

Identifiers

PMID26925033
PMCPMC4757684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.