Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924951›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2016

Targeting LAMP2 in human cerebrospinal fluid with a combination of immunopurification and high resolution parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.

Simon Sjödin, Annika Öhrfelt, Gunnar Brinkmalm, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Ann Brinkmalm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomic features, tolerance index, secondary metabolites and protein content of chickpea (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon SjödinDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Annika ÖhrfeltDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Gunnar BrinkmalmDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden ; UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Ann BrinkmalmDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Mölndal, University of Gothenburg, House V3, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia. An increasing body of evidence suggests that endo-lysosomal dysfunction is a pathogenic mechanism of Alzheimer's disease. Thus there is a potential for proteins involved in the normal function of endo-lysosomal vesicles to act as biomarkers of disease. Herein we focused on the lysosomal protein LAMP2 that is involved in chaperone mediated autophagy.

resultsUsing a combination of immunoprecipitation, digestion and nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry we targeted and identified six tryptic LAMP2 peptides in human cerebrospinal fluid. Employing the identified proteotypic tryptic peptides a hybrid immunoprecipitation high resolution parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometric method was developed for the relative quantitation of LAMP2. The method was evaluated in a number of experiments which defined the overall methodological as well as the analytical micro-liquid chromatography mass spectrometric intra- and inter-day variability. We identified an overall methodological peptide dependent intra-day variability of 8-16 %. The inter-day experiments showed similar results. The analytical contribution to the variation was minor with a coefficient of variation of 0.5-2.1 %, depending on the peptide. Using the developed method, with defined and limited variability, we report increased cerebrospinal fluid levels of three LAMP2 peptides in Alzheimer's disease subjects (n = 14), as compared to non-Alzheimer's disease controls (n = 14).

conclusionAltered LAMP2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid may indicate endo-lysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. However, further studies in larger cohorts comprised of well-defined patient materials are required. We here present a tool which can be used for exploring the relevance of the level of LAMP2 as a potential measure of lysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease or other neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkerCerebrospinal fluidEndo-lysosomal dysfunctionImmunoprecipitationLAMP2Neurodegenerative diseasesParallel reaction monitoring

Identifiers

PMID26924951
PMCPMC4768413
OpenAlexW2283290523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.