ArticleJournal of forensic psychology practice2016
Web-Based Violence Risk Monitoring Tool in Psychoses: Pilot Study in Community Forensic Patients.
Article in Journal of forensic psychology practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2018Pooled it
- Hierarchical machine learning model integrating clinical history and nursing observations for predicting violent behavior in hospitalized schizophrenia patients.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Integrating static and modifiable risk factors in violence risk assessment for forensic psychiatric patients: a feasibility study of FoVOx.Nordic journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Editorial: Evidence-based frameworks of assessment and treatment in forensic psychiatry practice.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Digital Technologies for Schizophrenia Management: A Descriptive Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Review
- The True Colours Remote Symptom Monitoring System: A Decade of Evolution.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Predicting Inpatient Aggression in Forensic Services Using Remote Monitoring Technology: Qualitative Study of Staff Perspectives.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Prediction of violent reoffending in prisoners and individuals on probation: a Dutch validation study (OxRec).Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Prediction of violent crime on discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: A clinical prediction rule (FoVOx).European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2018Article
- Violence prevention in psychiatry: an umbrella review of interventions in general and forensic psychiatry.The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We describe the development and pilot testing of a novel, web-based, violence risk monitoring instrument for use in community patients with psychoses. We describe the development of the tool, including drawing on systematic reviews of the field, how item content was operationalized, the development of a user interface, and its subsequent piloting. Sixty-eight patients were included from three English counties, who had been discharged from forensic psychiatric services. Over 12 months, 310 questionnaires were completed on the sample by professionals from several disciplines and qualitative feedback collected relating to the use of the tool using an electronic survey. Strengths of this approach for risk assessment, and potential limitations and areas for future research, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.