Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924540›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2016

Psychometric properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool of mechanical ventilation for emergency medicine residents in the northeastern United States.

Jeremy B Richards, Tania D Strout, Todd A Seigel, Susan R Wilcox

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy B RichardsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8922-1955
Tania D StroutTufts University School of Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center; Portland, ME, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-1523
Todd A SeigelOakland and Richmond Medical Centers; Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-6848
Susan R WilcoxDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-7531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrior descriptions of the psychometric properties of validated knowledge assessment tools designed to determine Emergency medicine (EM) residents understanding of physiologic and clinical concepts related to mechanical ventilation are lacking. In this setting, we have performed this study to describe the psychometric and performance properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool that measures EM residents' knowledge of topics in mechanical ventilation.

methodsResults from a multicenter, prospective, survey study involving 219 EM residents from 8 academic hospitals in northeastern United States were analyzed to quantify reliability, item difficulty, and item discrimination of each of the 9 questions included in the knowledge assessment tool for 3 weeks, beginning in January 2013.

resultsThe response rate for residents completing the knowledge assessment tool was 68.6% (214 out of 312 EM residents). Reliability was assessed by both Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.6293) and the Spearman-Brown coefficient (0.6437). Item difficulty ranged from 0.39 to 0.96, with a mean item difficulty of 0.75 for all 9 questions. Uncorrected item discrimination values ranged from 0.111 to 0.556. Corrected item-total correlations were determined by removing the question being assessed from analysis, resulting in a range of item discrimination from 0.139 to 0.498.

conclusionReliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were within satisfactory ranges in this study, demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties of this knowledge assessment tool. This assessment indicates that this knowledge assessment tool is sufficiently rigorous for use in future research studies or for assessment of EM residents for evaluative purposes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyEducational MeasurementEmergency MedicineHumansNew EnglandProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency medicineProspective studiesPsychometricsReproducibility of resultsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26924540
PMCPMC4789563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.