Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924525›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2016

Presentation of hepatocellular antigens.

Arash Grakoui, Ian Nicholas Crispe

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Serotonin receptor 5-HTJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Liver and the Hepatic Immune Response inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antigen Cross-Presentation by Macrophages.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Murine Models of Hepatitis A Virus Infection.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arash GrakouiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine and Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ian Nicholas CrispeDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
YNPRC NHP CLINICAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM - SUPPLEMENTP51RR000165 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, JOHN DAVID · 1985 to 2011
$114.0M
Mechanisms of hepatitis C virus persistenceR01AI070101 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GRAKOUI, ARASH · 2006 to 2016
$3.9M
Innate Immune Response to Hepatocyte DeathR01AI114630 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRISPE, IAN NICHOLAS · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Host and viral determinants of hepatitis C virus macaque infectionR21AI118337 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI EVANS, MATTHEW J, GRAKOUI, ARASH · 2015 to 2016
$499k
Sessile Kupffer Cells in Liver ToleranceR21AI114827 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRISPE, IAN NICHOLAS · 2015 to 2016
$425k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000165NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070101NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114630NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI114827NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI118337NIH HHS P51 OD011132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is an organ in which antigen-specific T-cell responses manifest a bias toward immune tolerance. This is clearly seen in the rejection of allogeneic liver transplants, and multiple other phenomena suggest that this effect is more general. These include tolerance toward antigens introduced via the portal vein, immune failure to several hepatotropic viruses, the lack of natural liver-stage immunity to malaria parasites, and the frequent metastasis of cancers to the liver. Here we review the mechanisms by which T cells engage with hepatocellular antigens, the context in which such encounters occur, and the mechanisms that act to suppress a full T-cell response. While many mechanisms play a role, we will argue that two important processes are the constraints on the cross-presentation of hepatocellular antigens, and the induction of negative feedback inhibition driven by interferons. The constant exposure of the liver to microbial products from the intestine may drive innate immunity, rendering the local environment unfavorable for specific T-cell responses through this mechanism. Nevertheless, tolerance toward hepatocellular antigens is not monolithic and under specific circumstances allows both effective immunity and immunopathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsHepatocytesHumansImmune ToleranceInflammationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID26924525
PMCPMC4856799
OpenAlexW2327593090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.