Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924443›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Effect of family medicine groups on visits to the emergency department among diabetic patients in Quebec between 2000 and 2011: a population-based segmented regression analysis.

Renee Carter, Amélie Quesnel-Vallée, Céline Plante, Philippe Gamache, Jean-Frédéric Lévesque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Health Problems: Profiles, Correlates, and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renee CarterDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. renee.carter@mail.mcgill.ca.
Amélie Quesnel-ValléeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. amelie.quesnelvallee@mcgill.ca.
Céline PlanteInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 945 Avenue Wolfe, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada. celine.plante@inspq.qc.ca.
Philippe GamacheInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 945 Avenue Wolfe, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada. philippe.gamache@inspq.qc.ca.
Jean-Frédéric LévesqueBureau of Health Information, Level 11 Sage Building, 67 Albert Avenue, Chastwood, NSW, Australia. jeanfrederic.levesque@health.nsw.gov.au.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily Medicine Groups (FMG) were introduced in Quebec in 2002 to re-organize primary care practices and encourage inter-professional service delivery. We measured visits to the emergency department (ED) for acute complications related to diabetes as a proxy for access to and quality of primary care, before and after the reform using an open cohort of individuals diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

methodsThe weekly rate of ED visits between April 1, 2000 and March 31, 2012 were derived from administrative databases. We performed an interrupted segmented regression analysis to obtain the estimated and predicted rates of visits in the years following the introduction of the reform. An outcome control series of diabetic patients visiting the ED to treat appendicitis was incorporated to strengthen the study's internal validity.

resultsAfter 9 years of reform implementation, we observed a statistically significant absolute decrease of 2.12 and 2.25 ED visits per 10,000 diabetic patients per week to treat acute diabetes-related complications in urban and rural areas, respectively. However, the magnitude of the changes between the estimated and predicted rates did not differ significantly over time. No statistically significant change in the rate of ED visits for appendicitis was observed.

conclusionOur findings suggest that the introduction of the FMG model produced reductions in the weekly rate of avoidable visits to the ED. Our results also imply that despite a greater proportion of the diabetes population being enrolled with FMG physicians across the province over time, the added benefit may be minimal. More studies examining this issue are needed to inform future policy.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Emergency Service, HospitalFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26924443
PMCPMC4770695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.