Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Statistical prediction of protein structural, localization and functional properties by the analysis of its fragment mass distributions after proteolytic cleavage.

Mikhail I Bogachev, Airat R Kayumov, Oleg A Markelov, Armin Bunde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of protein size, thermodynamic stability, and net charge on cotranslational folding on the ribosome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikhail I BogachevBiomedical Engineering Research Center, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia.
Airat R KayumovDepartment of Genetics, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Tatarstan, 420008, Russia.
Oleg A MarkelovBiomedical Engineering Research Center, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia.
Armin BundeInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University · RUKazan Federal University · RUUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural, localization and functional properties of unknown proteins are often being predicted from their primary polypeptide chains using sequence alignment with already characterized proteins and consequent molecular modeling. Here we suggest an approach to predict various structural and structure-associated properties of proteins directly from the mass distributions of their proteolytic cleavage fragments. For amino-acid-specific cleavages, the distributions of fragment masses are determined by the distributions of inter-amino-acid intervals in the protein, that in turn apparently reflect its structural and structure-related features. Large-scale computer simulations revealed that for transmembrane proteins, either α-helical or β -barrel secondary structure could be predicted with about 90% accuracy after thermolysin cleavage. Moreover, 3/4 intrinsically disordered proteins could be correctly distinguished from proteins with fixed three-dimensional structure belonging to all four SCOP structural classes by combining 3-4 different cleavages. Additionally, in some cases the protein cellular localization (cytosolic or membrane-associated) and its host organism (Firmicute or Proteobacteria) could be predicted with around 80% accuracy. In contrast to cytosolic proteins, for membrane-associated proteins exhibiting specific structural conformations, their monotopic or transmembrane localization and functional group (ATP-binding, transporters, sensors and so on) could be also predicted with high accuracy and particular robustness against missing cleavages.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularModels, StatisticalProtein ConformationBacterial ProteinsIntracellular SpaceMass SpectrometryMolecular WeightPeptide FragmentsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein TransportProteolysisReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveStructure-Activity RelationshipBacterial ProteinsPeptide FragmentsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26924271
PMCPMC4770285
OpenAlexW2316412313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.