Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924128›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2016

A first-in-human dose-escalation study of the oral proteasome inhibitor oprozomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Jeffrey R Infante, David S Mendelson, Howard A Burris, Johanna C Bendell, Anthony W Tolcher, Michael S Gordon, Heidi H Gillenwater, Shirin Arastu-Kapur, Hansen L Wong, Kyriakos P Papadopoulos

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Proteasome regulators in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R InfanteSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, 250 25th Avenue North, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. jinfante@tnonc.com.
David S MendelsonPinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Howard A BurrisSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, 250 25th Avenue North, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Johanna C BendellSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, 250 25th Avenue North, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Anthony W TolcherSouth Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (START), San Antonio, TX, USA.
Michael S GordonPinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Heidi H GillenwaterOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen Subsidiary, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shirin Arastu-KapurOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen Subsidiary, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Hansen L WongOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen Subsidiary, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kyriakos P PapadopoulosSouth Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (START), San Antonio, TX, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USPinnacle Oncology Hematology · USSouth Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics · USTennessee Oncology · USSarah Cannon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the tripeptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor oprozomib in patients with advanced refractory or recurrent solid tumors.

methodsPatients received escalating once daily (QD) or split doses of oprozomib on days 1-5 of 14-day cycles (C). The split-dose arm was implemented and compared in fasted (C1) and fed (C2) states. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected during C1 and C2. Proteasome inhibition was evaluated in red blood cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

resultsForty-four patients (QD, n = 25; split dose, n = 19) were enrolled. The most common primary tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (18%) and colorectal cancer (16%). In the 180-mg QD cohort, two patients experienced DLTs: grade 3 vomiting and dehydration; grade 3 hypophosphatemia (n = 1 each). In the split-dose group, three DLTs were observed (180-mg cohort: grade 3 hypophosphatemia; 210-mg cohort: grade 5 gastrointestinal hemorrhage and grade 3 hallucinations (n = 1 each). In the QD and split-dose groups, the MTD was 150 and 180 mg, respectively. Common adverse events (all grades) included nausea (91%), vomiting (86%), and diarrhea (61%). Peak concentrations and total exposure of oprozomib generally increased with the increasing dose. Oprozomib induced dose-dependent proteasome inhibition. Best response was stable disease.

conclusionsWhile generally low-grade, clinically relevant gastrointestinal toxicities occurred frequently with this oprozomib formulation. Despite dose-dependent increases in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, single-agent oprozomib had minimal antitumor activity in this patient population with advanced solid tumors.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOligopeptidesProteasome InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsOligopeptidesONX 0912Proteasome InhibitorsCarfilzomibDose escalationOprozomibPhase 1Proteasome inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26924128
OpenAlexW2291965619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.