Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26924040›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2016

Dorsolateral neostriatum contribution to incentive salience: opioid or dopamine stimulation makes one reward cue more motivationally attractive than another.

Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio, Kent C Berridge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Separating desire from prediction of outcome value.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. μ-opioid receptor availability is associated with sex drive in human males.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Dopaminergic Control of the Feeding Circuit.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Thirst recruits phasic dopamine signaling through subfornical organ neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexandra G DiFeliceantonioJohn B Pierce Laboratory at Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-6060
Kent C BerridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Affective neuroscience of taste reactivityR01MH063649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2002 to 2024
$7.8M
Cue-triggered Reward SeekingR01DA015188 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2003 to 2021
$4.9M
SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015188NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian cues for rewards can become attractive incentives: approached and 'wanted' as the rewards themselves. The motivational attractiveness of a previously learned cue is not fixed, but can be dynamically amplified during re-encounter by simultaneous activation of brain limbic circuitry. Here it was reported that opioid or dopamine microinjections in the dorsolateral quadrant of the neostriatum (DLS) of rats selectively amplify attraction toward a previously learned Pavlovian cue in an individualized fashion, at the expense of a competing cue. In an autoshaping (sign-tracking vs. goal-tracking) paradigm, microinjection of the mu opioid receptor agonist (DAMGO) or dopamine indirect agonist (amphetamine) in the DLS of sign-tracker individuals selectively enhanced their sign-tracking attraction toward the reward-predictive lever cue. By contrast, DAMGO or amphetamine in the DLS of goal-trackers selectively enhanced prepotent attraction toward the reward-proximal cue of sucrose dish. Amphetamine also enhanced goal-tracking in some sign-tracker individuals (if they ever defected to the dish even once). That DLS enhancement of cue attraction was due to stronger motivation, not stronger habits, was suggested by: (i) sign-trackers flexibly followed their cue to a new location when the lever was suddenly moved after DLS DAMGO microinjection; and (ii) DAMGO in the DLS also made sign-trackers work harder on a new instrumental nose-poke response required to earn presentations of their Pavlovian lever cue (instrumental conditioned reinforcement). Altogether, the current results suggest that DLS circuitry can enhance the incentive salience of a Pavlovian reward cue, selectively making that cue a stronger motivational magnet.

Indexed as

CuesMotivationRewardAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDopamine AgonistsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-FemaleNeostriatumRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Opioid, muAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidDopamine AgonistsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Receptors, Opioid, muautoshapingmotivationratstriatum

Identifiers

PMID26924040
PMCPMC4846486
OpenAlexW2287497437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.