Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26923719›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Microspatial variability in community structure and photophysiology of calcified macroalgal microbiomes revealed by coupling of hyperspectral and high-resolution fluorescence imaging.

R G Perkins, C J Williamson, J Brodie, L Barillé, P Launeau, J Lavaud, M L Yallop, B Jesus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R G PerkinsSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Glamorgan, CF10 3AT, UK.
C J WilliamsonSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Glamorgan, CF10 3AT, UK.
J BrodieNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
L BarilléUniversité de Nantes, Labotoire de Mer Molécules Santé EA 2160, Faculté des Sciences et des Techniques, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes cedex 3, France.
P LauneauLUNAM Université, Université de Nantes, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique UMR 6112, Faculté des Sciences et des Techniques, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes cedex 3, France.
J LavaudUMR7266 LIENSs 'Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés', CNRS/Université de La Rochelle, Institut du Littoral et de l'Environnement, La Rochelle, France.
M L YallopSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
B JesusUniversité de Nantes, Labotoire de Mer Molécules Santé EA 2160, Faculté des Sciences et des Techniques, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes cedex 3, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcifying coralline macroalgae provide biogenic habitats colonised by epiphytic microalgae that contribute significantly to community productivity. Georeferenced hyperspectral and high-resolution fluorescence imaging were coupled to microspatially mapped community composition and relative biomass of macroalgal host and epiphyte microalgal groups, and their weighted contributions to productivity within host fronds of Corallina officinalis on upper and lower zones of a rocky shore were determined. Lower shore epiphytes were dominated by filamentous diatoms (Bacillariophyta), confined to the apex of the frond structure, which were low light acclimated but retained a high capacity for photoprotective down regulation and contributed up to 51% of total community productivity. Upper shore epiphytes were dominated by green algae (Chlorophyta) and single-celled diatoms (principally Cocconeis spp.), which were high light acclimated but present at far lower relative biomass and contributed negligibly to productivity. The host, C. officinalis was the main primary producer. Variation in light environment resulting from differences in shore height and shading within the host macroalga, likely play a large role in determining patterns in epiphyte community structure, biomass and productivity observed. Additionally, microspatial gradients in photophysiological parameters along the host macroalga likely resulted from age-dependent variation in pigments as well as the gradient in light environment.

Indexed as

Calcification, PhysiologicFluorescenceMicrobiotaSeaweedBiomassOptical Imaging

Identifiers

PMID26923719
PMCPMC4770322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.